![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, are queries that contain an ORDER BY inherently non-updatable, or does it depend on , for example, the column it is ordered for? Or, to put it this way, is this a limitation of SQL Anywhere 8, or is it a limitation of the SQL query itself? Thanks for all advice, Martin |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, are queries that contain an ORDER BY inherently non-updatable, or does it depend on , for example, the column it is ordered for? Or, to put it this way, is this a limitation of SQL Anywhere 8, or is it a limitation of the SQL query itself? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <3fd44cfa.1f6d.846930886 (AT) sybase (DOT) com>, Martin Sahm says... Hi, are queries that contain an ORDER BY inherently non-updatable, or does it depend on , for example, the column it is ordered for? Or, to put it this way, is this a limitation of SQL Anywhere 8, or is it a limitation of the SQL query itself? IME, a simple "select * from x order by y" is updateable if the ORDER BY can be resolved by an index. Other cases may work as well, depending on the complexity of the statement. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |