![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello, I use SQL Anywhere 5.5.04 on Windows and SQL Anywhere 7.0.2 on Linux. I exclude many rows of a table and the database grow up. OK, caused by rollback and checkpoint logs. But, the database grow up more on Linux than Windows. Obviously my tests starts with the same database. Why this different behavior between Linux and Windows? Thanks in advance, Renato Cramer. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
For a start, the database file format is different between the two releases, so that may account for some of the difference. Is the database page size identical between the two databases? What *is* the difference, anyway? Glenn Renato Cramer wrote in news:444e6f87.d0b.1681692777 (AT) sybase (DOT) com: Hello, I use SQL Anywhere 5.5.04 on Windows and SQL Anywhere 7.0.2 on Linux. I exclude many rows of a table and the database grow up. OK, caused by rollback and checkpoint logs. But, the database grow up more on Linux than Windows. Obviously my tests starts with the same database. Why this different behavior between Linux and Windows? Thanks in advance, Renato Cramer. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Yes, the database page size is identical because is the same database (files .db and .log) to both tests. In others words, I have a database, I get this database, put on linux and make the test. After, I get the same database, put on Windows and make exactly the same test. This database was created with SQL Anywhere 5.5. The database has 200 MB. After the test on Linux, 250 MB. After the test on Windows, 220 MB. Why? Thanks in advance. Renato Cramer. For a start, the database file format is different between the two releases, so that may account for some of the difference. Is the database page size identical between the two databases? What *is* the difference, anyway? Glenn Renato Cramer wrote in news:444e6f87.d0b.1681692777 (AT) sybase (DOT) com: Hello, I use SQL Anywhere 5.5.04 on Windows and SQL Anywhere 7.0.2 on Linux. I exclude many rows of a table and the database grow up. OK, caused by rollback and checkpoint logs. But, the database grow up more on Linux than Windows. Obviously my tests starts with the same database. Why this different behavior between Linux and Windows? Thanks in advance, Renato Cramer. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Yes, the database page size is identical because is the same database (files .db and .log) to both tests. In others words, I have a database, I get this database, put on linux and make the test. After, I get the same database, put on Windows and make exactly the same test. This database was created with SQL Anywhere 5.5. The database has 200 MB. After the test on Linux, 250 MB. After the test on Windows, 220 MB. Why? Thanks in advance. Renato Cramer. For a start, the database file format is different between the two releases, so that may account for some of the difference. Is the database page size identical between the two databases? What *is* the difference, anyway? Glenn Renato Cramer wrote in news:444e6f87.d0b.1681692777 (AT) sybase (DOT) com: Hello, I use SQL Anywhere 5.5.04 on Windows and SQL Anywhere 7.0.2 on Linux. I exclude many rows of a table and the database grow up. OK, caused by rollback and checkpoint logs. But, the database grow up more on Linux than Windows. Obviously my tests starts with the same database. Why this different behavior between Linux and Windows? Thanks in advance, Renato Cramer. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |