![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm assuming the access of the physical tables on server #1 by server #2 are responsible for the process running "OmniServer-170". Is this correct? |
|
Hi All, I have 2 Sybase Dataservers (one running ASE 12.5.1 and the other running ASE 12.5.2). Server #1 hosts a few tables that are shared via the proxy mechanism with server #2, and I see the following connections to server #1: login pid spid blkd host program name command dbname ------------ ----- ---- ---- ---------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------ NULL 2 0 DEADLOCK TUNE master NULL 3 0 MIRROR HANDLER master NULL 4 0 <astc> ASTC HANDLER master NULL 5 0 CHECKPOINT SLEEP master NULL 6 0 HK WASH master NULL 7 0 HK GC master NULL 8 0 HK CHORES master NULL 9 0 PORT MANAGER master NULL 10 0 NETWORK HANDLER master NULL 11 0 HBC HANDLER master NULL 12 0 JOB SCHEDULER sybmgmtdb NULL 88 0 <rep agent> REP AGENT products jstask 12865 15 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 16 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 17 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 18 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 19 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 20 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 21 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 22 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb sa 496 33 0 SPRING OmniServer-170 SELECT master I'm assuming the access of the physical tables on server #1 by server #2 are responsible for the process running "OmniServer-170". Is this correct? TIA -wrb |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm assuming the access of the physical tables on server #1 by server #2 are responsible for the process running "OmniServer-170". Is this correct? Hope somone has answered you. The answer is "yes." |
|
Hi All, I have 2 Sybase Dataservers (one running ASE 12.5.1 and the other running ASE 12.5.2). Server #1 hosts a few tables that are shared via the proxy mechanism with server #2, and I see the following connections to server #1: login pid spid blkd host program name command dbname ------------ ----- ---- ---- ---------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------ NULL 2 0 DEADLOCK TUNE master NULL 3 0 MIRROR HANDLER master NULL 4 0 <astc> ASTC HANDLER master NULL 5 0 CHECKPOINT SLEEP master NULL 6 0 HK WASH master NULL 7 0 HK GC master NULL 8 0 HK CHORES master NULL 9 0 PORT MANAGER master NULL 10 0 NETWORK HANDLER master NULL 11 0 HBC HANDLER master NULL 12 0 JOB SCHEDULER sybmgmtdb NULL 88 0 <rep agent> REP AGENT products jstask 12865 15 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 16 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 17 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 18 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 19 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 20 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 21 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 22 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb sa 496 33 0 SPRING OmniServer-170 SELECT master I'm assuming the access of the physical tables on server #1 by server #2 are responsible for the process running "OmniServer-170". Is this correct? TIA -wrb |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm assuming the access of the physical tables on server #1 by server #2 are responsible for the process running "OmniServer-170". Is this correct? Hope somone has answered you. The answer is "yes." |
|
Regards. "Will Banta" <""NO SPAM wbanta\"@deerfieldcapital.com NO SPAM"> wrote in message news:41c6dedb$1 (AT) forums-1-dub (DOT) .. Hi All, I have 2 Sybase Dataservers (one running ASE 12.5.1 and the other running ASE 12.5.2). Server #1 hosts a few tables that are shared via the proxy mechanism with server #2, and I see the following connections to server #1: login pid spid blkd host program name command dbname ------------ ----- ---- ---- ---------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------ NULL 2 0 DEADLOCK TUNE master NULL 3 0 MIRROR HANDLER master NULL 4 0 <astc> ASTC HANDLER master NULL 5 0 CHECKPOINT SLEEP master NULL 6 0 HK WASH master NULL 7 0 HK GC master NULL 8 0 HK CHORES master NULL 9 0 PORT MANAGER master NULL 10 0 NETWORK HANDLER master NULL 11 0 HBC HANDLER master NULL 12 0 JOB SCHEDULER sybmgmtdb NULL 88 0 <rep agent> REP AGENT products jstask 12865 15 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 16 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 17 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 18 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 19 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 20 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 21 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb jstask 12865 22 0 JS Agent AWAITING COMMAND sybmgmtdb sa 496 33 0 SPRING OmniServer-170 SELECT master I'm assuming the access of the physical tables on server #1 by server #2 are responsible for the process running "OmniServer-170". Is this correct? TIA -wrb |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |