![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm not trying to be controversial, but could you provide more details about how your code works better than existing code? Maybe you are doing something that these 3rd party vendors could learn from to enhance their offerings and save someone else time down the road. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP] (ten.xoc (AT) dnartreb (DOT) noraa) writes: I'm not trying to be controversial, but could you provide more details about how your code works better than existing code? Maybe you are doing something that these 3rd party vendors could learn from to enhance their offerings and save someone else time down the road. Maybe Chris wanted some special tweak fit the local standards where he work. While it takes Chris some time to develop his tool, it's not that tricky to do, and it is a good exercise in using the catalog views. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
It's great that you're speaking for him, but I'm still curious what it is exactly. If there's something the free tools and 3rd party utilities aren't doing, even if Chris *wants* the exercise of using the catalog views to achieve it, it still might be beneficial to others who don't. On 8/5/09 5:21 PM, in article Xns9C5EEC5BE5AB5Yazorman (AT) 127 (DOT) 0.0.1, "Erland Sommarskog" <esquel (AT) sommarskog (DOT) se> wrote: Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP] (ten.xoc (AT) dnartreb (DOT) noraa) writes: I'm not trying to be controversial, but could you provide more details about how your code works better than existing code? Maybe you are doing something that these 3rd party vendors could learn from to enhance their offerings and save someone else time down the road. Maybe Chris wanted some special tweak fit the local standards where he work. While it takes Chris some time to develop his tool, it's not that tricky to do, and it is a good exercise in using the catalog views. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |