![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
I will agree that this is very annoying and has been a relatively warm topic since SQL Server 2005 was first put into beta. *Unfortunately it still works that way in the SQL Server 2008 tools and there isn't much indication that they're going to fix in in the version after that either (they don't seemto think anything is broken). http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 4 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 3 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 2 You have some crafty workaround but they seem very cumbersome to me. *I don't really approve of open table for editing data anyway; maybe you could make an Access project with linked tables and edit the data there, or write a quick web or win form front end that translates 0 and 1 correctly, or simply use proper DML (INSERT/UPDATE) statements in a query window. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
I will agree that this is very annoying and has been a relatively warm topic since SQL Server 2005 was first put into beta. *Unfortunately it still works that way in the SQL Server 2008 tools and there isn't much indication that they're going to fix in in the version after that either (they don't seemto think anything is broken). http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 4 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 3 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 2 You have some crafty workaround but they seem very cumbersome to me. *I don't really approve of open table for editing data anyway; maybe you could make an Access project with linked tables and edit the data there, or write a quick web or win form front end that translates 0 and 1 correctly, or simply use proper DML (INSERT/UPDATE) statements in a query window. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
I will agree that this is very annoying and has been a relatively warm topic since SQL Server 2005 was first put into beta. *Unfortunately it still works that way in the SQL Server 2008 tools and there isn't much indication that they're going to fix in in the version after that either (they don't seemto think anything is broken). http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 4 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 3 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 2 You have some crafty workaround but they seem very cumbersome to me. *I don't really approve of open table for editing data anyway; maybe you could make an Access project with linked tables and edit the data there, or write a quick web or win form front end that translates 0 and 1 correctly, or simply use proper DML (INSERT/UPDATE) statements in a query window. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
I will agree that this is very annoying and has been a relatively warm topic since SQL Server 2005 was first put into beta. *Unfortunately it still works that way in the SQL Server 2008 tools and there isn't much indication that they're going to fix in in the version after that either (they don't seemto think anything is broken). http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 4 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 3 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 2 You have some crafty workaround but they seem very cumbersome to me. *I don't really approve of open table for editing data anyway; maybe you could make an Access project with linked tables and edit the data there, or write a quick web or win form front end that translates 0 and 1 correctly, or simply use proper DML (INSERT/UPDATE) statements in a query window. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
I will agree that this is very annoying and has been a relatively warm topic since SQL Server 2005 was first put into beta. *Unfortunately it still works that way in the SQL Server 2008 tools and there isn't much indication that they're going to fix in in the version after that either (they don't seemto think anything is broken). http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 4 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 3 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 2 You have some crafty workaround but they seem very cumbersome to me. *I don't really approve of open table for editing data anyway; maybe you could make an Access project with linked tables and edit the data there, or write a quick web or win form front end that translates 0 and 1 correctly, or simply use proper DML (INSERT/UPDATE) statements in a query window. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
I will agree that this is very annoying and has been a relatively warm topic since SQL Server 2005 was first put into beta. *Unfortunately it still works that way in the SQL Server 2008 tools and there isn't much indication that they're going to fix in in the version after that either (they don't seemto think anything is broken). http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 4 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 3 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 2 You have some crafty workaround but they seem very cumbersome to me. *I don't really approve of open table for editing data anyway; maybe you could make an Access project with linked tables and edit the data there, or write a quick web or win form front end that translates 0 and 1 correctly, or simply use proper DML (INSERT/UPDATE) statements in a query window. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
I will agree that this is very annoying and has been a relatively warm topic since SQL Server 2005 was first put into beta. *Unfortunately it still works that way in the SQL Server 2008 tools and there isn't much indication that they're going to fix in in the version after that either (they don't seemto think anything is broken). http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 4 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 3 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 2 You have some crafty workaround but they seem very cumbersome to me. *I don't really approve of open table for editing data anyway; maybe you could make an Access project with linked tables and edit the data there, or write a quick web or win form front end that translates 0 and 1 correctly, or simply use proper DML (INSERT/UPDATE) statements in a query window. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
I will agree that this is very annoying and has been a relatively warm topic since SQL Server 2005 was first put into beta. *Unfortunately it still works that way in the SQL Server 2008 tools and there isn't much indication that they're going to fix in in the version after that either (they don't seemto think anything is broken). http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 4 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 3 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 2 You have some crafty workaround but they seem very cumbersome to me. *I don't really approve of open table for editing data anyway; maybe you could make an Access project with linked tables and edit the data there, or write a quick web or win form front end that translates 0 and 1 correctly, or simply use proper DML (INSERT/UPDATE) statements in a query window. |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
I will agree that this is very annoying and has been a relatively warm topic since SQL Server 2005 was first put into beta. *Unfortunately it still works that way in the SQL Server 2008 tools and there isn't much indication that they're going to fix in in the version after that either (they don't seemto think anything is broken). http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 4 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 3 http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/fee...aspx?FeedbackI... 2 You have some crafty workaround but they seem very cumbersome to me. *I don't really approve of open table for editing data anyway; maybe you could make an Access project with linked tables and edit the data there, or write a quick web or win form front end that translates 0 and 1 correctly, or simply use proper DML (INSERT/UPDATE) statements in a query window. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |