![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I had a problem today with Sql Server Express 2005. For whatever reason, the network service account lost some permissions somewhere (probably an update; I don't know what it might be) and I could not start the sql server service. I change the service to use the local system account and it worked. Is there any security risk using the local system account versus the network service account? Why is there even a choice there? What's it matter? Thank you for any help. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I had a problem today with Sql Server Express 2005. For whatever reason, the network service account lost some permissions somewhere (probably an update; I don't know what it might be) and I could not start the sql server service. I change the service to use the local system account and it worked. Is there any security risk using the local system account versus the network service account? Why is there even a choice there? What's it matter? Thank you for any help. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, As the Local System Account is only allowed to access resources on the "localhost" you might get into trouble with (database) replication as it may need to access other servers. As far as I know the local System Account has not sufficient rights to access the other server. Regards, Frank. "jm" <needin4mation (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1154695761.453424.185900 (AT) s13g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com... I had a problem today with Sql Server Express 2005. For whatever reason, the network service account lost some permissions somewhere (probably an update; I don't know what it might be) and I could not start the sql server service. I change the service to use the local system account and it worked. Is there any security risk using the local system account versus the network service account? Why is there even a choice there? What's it matter? Thank you for any help. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |