![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
Can replication be setup between SQL Server 2005 64bit and 32bit? *I want the 32bit machine to be the failover database. *Thanks in advance for your reply. On Wednesday, February 13, 2008 8:25 PM pa wrote: We are testing Transactional replication from 2GB database to a standby servers , one local and one across the wan. Transaction replication is offering 1 - 3 seconds latency, which seems a great improvement on our current log shipping which is set to every 3 minutes. Whilst we can increase the frequency to 1 minute, transactional replication seems to be more resilient. Due to network constraints we are using a backup of the production database to perform the initial subscriber synchronisation. We are now testing whether the replicated database can be enabled with our application, i.e. to simulate a failover scenario by dropping the subscription. *I understand this will be a manual process. We have encountered problems with identity columns, where the seed is still set to the value when replication started and needs to be reset to the max value. We have set triggers set to Not For Replication, but have made no other database changes. All tables have primary keys. We do not require updating at the replicated databases. The questions I would like to ask are 1. Is transaction replication a viable alternative to log shipping as a way of maintaining standby servers in the environment described above? 2.. * * * *Are there any further steps we should carry out to make the replicated database suitable for use as the primary database in a failover scenario. On Wednesday, February 13, 2008 8:25 PM Hilary Cotter wrote: what you need to do is make the identity columns odd on one side, even on the other, do a dbcc checkident to make sure the next value asssigned on the odd side will be odd, and even on the other side. Then make sure that the not for replication property is in place for all identity columns. *On Feb 12, 12:59=A0pm, p... (AT) associateddynamics (DOT) com wrote: ing as On Monday, February 18, 2008 4:07 PM Paul Ibison wrote: The simplest option is to set it up for queued updating subscribers. That way you can assign a completely different range of identity values tothe subscriber and there will be no need for a manual process when failover occurs. You can also use the queue reader agent to sync back to the publisher when it comes up, or alternatively just remove replication from the subscriber. Also, if you need to reinitialize at any time, there is no need to use custom scripts to generate the subscriber's schema. Rgds, Paul Ibison (www.replicationanswers.com) Submitted via EggHeadCafe - Software Developer Portal of Choice ComponentOne Studio for ASP.NET AJAX - Free License Giveaway http://www.eggheadcafe.com/tutorials...5d-4ec8-b6d5-a.... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |