dbTalk Databases Forums  

up & down processor usage during process...

microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap


Discuss up & down processor usage during process... in the microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Jéjé
 
Posts: n/a

Default up & down processor usage during process... - 08-15-2005 , 11:05 AM






Hi,

I have created a new cube which contain only 1 measure which is a DCount
measure. (Dcount of employees)
when I process this cube the processor usage is strange...

I have 4 CPUs

the processors go to 100% during 10-15sec. then drop down to 5% for 1 CPU
only (the others are at 0%) for 30sec to 2 minutes!
then again my proc. go up to 100%...
and again...

during 100% pick the rows created/sec is between 350 000 and 450 000, during
"down" steps the number of rows is 15 000 to 30 000

and also, more I advance in the aggregations more the "down" step is long!
so the first "down" step takes 10sec, after 200 aggregations the down step
is more then 2minutes.

other counters:
during 100% usage: memory size rows go from 0 to 5 millions, temp file rows
is 0
during 5% usage: memory size rows still at 5 millions, but the temp file
rows is 200 000 to 400 000

if I monitor the olap temporary folder, the files here are allways a 0
bytes. and the temp file bytes written/sec has no values!

the overall process time is 35minutes for 7millions of rows, the equivalent
cube, without the dcount measure, takes only 5 minutes!!!

and to finish with my stats...
the disk usage of this cube is:
fact.data = 140mb
agg.rigid.data = 171mb
agg.flex.data= 50mb

the equivalent non-dcount cube is:
fact.data = 107mb
agg.rigid.data = 3mb
agg.flex.data= 36kb

(other files are equivalent in the 2 cubes)

I have try changing some aggregations in my cube without success.
I have double the buffer size and read-ahead buffer, but there is no
changes.
and another strange point: the number of rows (memory size row counter) is
11 millions while I have only 7millions in my source DB!!!!

any idea?
can I do something?
why there is a so high rigid.data and flex.data sizes?
I plan to test cube partitioning.

thanks for your comments.

jerome.



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.