![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am still trying to get my head around the UDM concept. In particular I am interested in the following questions I cant see to answer: 1. Is the UDM a big cube? 2. Can I access the UDM without having a cube, i.e for a relational system? 3. Is a perspective a type of cube?! 4. How do all these things relate, especially when looking back to AS 2000?! Sorry if this things seem vague!!! -- Simmo |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
A good reference on the UDM can be found at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...IntrotoUDM.asp In general the UDM is a bridge between the different data sources and the client tools that access them. Saying that, the MS solution to the UDM is to utilize Analysis Services and providing various cubes (vs. just one big cube). -- HTH! Denny Lee dennyglee_at_hotmail_dot_com Blog at:: http://spaces.msn.com/members/denster/ "Simmo" <Simmo (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1325EAD1-F422-40B7-BB97-49BBFCA23801 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... I am still trying to get my head around the UDM concept. In particular I am interested in the following questions I cant see to answer: 1. Is the UDM a big cube? 2. Can I access the UDM without having a cube, i.e for a relational system? 3. Is a perspective a type of cube?! 4. How do all these things relate, especially when looking back to AS 2000?! Sorry if this things seem vague!!! -- Simmo |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks Denny I have read this article before. However you cant seem to access the UDM unless you actually build one or more cubes? Therefore the UDM doesnt seem to be accessible unless done as an OLAP/cube style structure? Any more ideas? -- Simmo "Denny Lee" wrote: A good reference on the UDM can be found at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...IntrotoUDM.asp In general the UDM is a bridge between the different data sources and the client tools that access them. Saying that, the MS solution to the UDM is to utilize Analysis Services and providing various cubes (vs. just one big cube). -- HTH! Denny Lee dennyglee_at_hotmail_dot_com Blog at:: http://spaces.msn.com/members/denster/ "Simmo" <Simmo (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1325EAD1-F422-40B7-BB97-49BBFCA23801 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... I am still trying to get my head around the UDM concept. In particular I am interested in the following questions I cant see to answer: 1. Is the UDM a big cube? 2. Can I access the UDM without having a cube, i.e for a relational system? 3. Is a perspective a type of cube?! 4. How do all these things relate, especially when looking back to AS 2000?! Sorry if this things seem vague!!! -- Simmo |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
See http://spaces.msn.com/members/cwebbbi/Blog/cns!1pi7ETChsJ1un_2s41jm9Iyg!325.entry ...for my view on this matter... -- Blog at: http://spaces.msn.com/members/cwebbbi/ "Simmo" wrote: Thanks Denny I have read this article before. However you cant seem to access the UDM unless you actually build one or more cubes? Therefore the UDM doesnt seem to be accessible unless done as an OLAP/cube style structure? Any more ideas? -- Simmo "Denny Lee" wrote: A good reference on the UDM can be found at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...IntrotoUDM.asp In general the UDM is a bridge between the different data sources and the client tools that access them. Saying that, the MS solution to the UDM is to utilize Analysis Services and providing various cubes (vs. just one big cube). -- HTH! Denny Lee dennyglee_at_hotmail_dot_com Blog at:: http://spaces.msn.com/members/denster/ "Simmo" <Simmo (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1325EAD1-F422-40B7-BB97-49BBFCA23801 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... I am still trying to get my head around the UDM concept. In particular I am interested in the following questions I cant see to answer: 1. Is the UDM a big cube? 2. Can I access the UDM without having a cube, i.e for a relational system? 3. Is a perspective a type of cube?! 4. How do all these things relate, especially when looking back to AS 2000?! Sorry if this things seem vague!!! -- Simmo |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks Chris that blog makes a lot of sense. Do you or anyone else have any thoughts on perspectives and DSVs and what the hierarchy of it all is, I cant seem to get a definitive picture... Cheers -- Simmo "Chris Webb" wrote: See http://spaces.msn.com/members/cwebbbi/Blog/cns!1pi7ETChsJ1un_2s41jm9Iyg!325.entry ...for my view on this matter... -- Blog at: http://spaces.msn.com/members/cwebbbi/ "Simmo" wrote: Thanks Denny I have read this article before. However you cant seem to access the UDM unless you actually build one or more cubes? Therefore the UDM doesnt seem to be accessible unless done as an OLAP/cube style structure? Any more ideas? -- Simmo "Denny Lee" wrote: A good reference on the UDM can be found at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...IntrotoUDM.asp In general the UDM is a bridge between the different data sources and the client tools that access them. Saying that, the MS solution to the UDM is to utilize Analysis Services and providing various cubes (vs. just one big cube). -- HTH! Denny Lee dennyglee_at_hotmail_dot_com Blog at:: http://spaces.msn.com/members/denster/ "Simmo" <Simmo (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1325EAD1-F422-40B7-BB97-49BBFCA23801 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... I am still trying to get my head around the UDM concept. In particular I am interested in the following questions I cant see to answer: 1. Is the UDM a big cube? 2. Can I access the UDM without having a cube, i.e for a relational system? 3. Is a perspective a type of cube?! 4. How do all these things relate, especially when looking back to AS 2000?! Sorry if this things seem vague!!! -- Simmo |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |