![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
This may be a newbie question, but if anybody has any guidance I would greatly appreciate it. I would think that I'm not the only one to be in this situation. The problem I'm having is that small, apparently irrelevant changes to my cubes cause the MOLAP data storage settings to be lost in AS2K. This can result in a great deal of effort in the way of recreating aggregation design, especially if many cubes & partitions are involved and/or if the aggregation designs for those cubes took advantage of usage-based optimization somewhere along the line. Is there a way to retain aggregation design in my partitions despite an insignificant change such as adding a new shared virtual dimension or a new measure? Is there perhaps a utility or an Analysis Manager option I am over-looking? If I remember right, the message I get to show that Analysis Manager is about to delete my work is simply: "Storage settings for your cube will be deleted." Any help would be GREATLY appreciated. Thanks in advance, David Beavon |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Both of the two events you describe, i.e. adding a measure and creating a virtual dimension, modify the internal structure of an aggregate and thus have to be redesigned. -- Dave Wickert [MSFT] dwickert (AT) online (DOT) microsoft.com Program Manager BI SystemsTeam SQL BI Product Unit (Analysis Services) |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
OK, I guess I understand that some internal implementation details may require rebuilding. But what I really want to preserve is the part of the aggregation design whereby we've spent a great deal of time determining % optimization, dimensions to aggregate on, levels to aggregate on, and we've even gone thru usage based optimization to add additional aggregations. It would seem the dimensions and levels of the aggregation design should be able to be preserved so all these steps aren't necessarily revisited. Is writing a custom DSO utility my only hope for solving this problem? Any help would be appreciated. David Beavon On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:09:49 -0800, "Dave Wickert [MSFT]" dwickert (AT) online (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote: Both of the two events you describe, i.e. adding a measure and creating a virtual dimension, modify the internal structure of an aggregate and thus have to be redesigned. -- Dave Wickert [MSFT] dwickert (AT) online (DOT) microsoft.com Program Manager BI SystemsTeam SQL BI Product Unit (Analysis Services) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |