![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am evaluating the ProClarity solution as tool of exploration for the final user. Alguem has notice on strong points and weak points of this |
|
The Olap Server is Microsoft Analysis Service. Thanks for the attention Edson Jr. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello, please give us some information about the requirements of your 'final users' and the kind of data (financial, technical ...), that will be analysed. ProClarity may be a very goot AdHoc-CubeBrowsing-tool, but I would see some disadvantages in standard reporting, or usage by users without knowledge of OLAP-structures. For this requirements I would prefer front-ends like dynaSight, Cognos, Crystal or something else ... Thomas Weiser http://www.antares-is.de http://www.dynaSight.net |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello, please give us some information about the requirements of your 'final users' and the kind of data (financial, technical ...), that will be analysed. ProClarity may be a very goot AdHoc-CubeBrowsing-tool, but I would see some disadvantages in standard reporting, or usage by users without knowledge of OLAP-structures. For this requirements I would prefer front-ends like dynaSight, Cognos, Crystal or something else ... Thomas Weiser http://www.antares-is.de http://www.dynaSight.net |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |