![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Dear all I implemented a SQL Server 2005 Olap system on a 64bit box with 8GB RAM. As far as I know msmdsrv.exe is the processname of SSAS. This SSAS process uses only 1GB RAM - but there is 2GB of free memory. What I think is strange is that the use of RAM stays with 1GB, even when more people start queries against the cube. I wronly assumed that msmdsrv.exe would claim more memory if the workload rises. With SSIS the situation is different - the process sqlservr.exe gets as much memory as possible. I had set a max. inside SQL Management Studio to prevent this process gets all memory. Seeing this situation I was asking myself, if I missed a memory configuration. Running SSIS, SSAS and SSRS on one machine some memory assignments perhaps could increase performance. Do you have an idea what is happening here? Regards, Marc |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
SSAS use the memory he need. so you can be surprised by the memory usage, but if its what the system required, you don't need more. remember that AS2005 don't load in memory all the dimensions and their members like AS2000 do. so the system load in memory information only when required. also there is advanced options in SSAS to manage the memory (min, max values etc...) so you can take a look here, but its not recommanded to change these parameters. from what I see in my deployments, SQL Server + SSAS + SSIS on the same box works really fine and the memory is correctly shared between the applications regarding which one required more ressources. so wait and see if you suffer performance issues "Marc" <Roger_Rombooth (AT) community (DOT) nospam> wrote in message news:E3B58D70-CF19-45FB-B8FA-972CB9287D5C (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Dear all I implemented a SQL Server 2005 Olap system on a 64bit box with 8GB RAM. As far as I know msmdsrv.exe is the processname of SSAS. This SSAS process uses only 1GB RAM - but there is 2GB of free memory. What I think is strange is that the use of RAM stays with 1GB, even when more people start queries against the cube. I wronly assumed that msmdsrv.exe would claim more memory if the workload rises. With SSIS the situation is different - the process sqlservr.exe gets as much memory as possible. I had set a max. inside SQL Management Studio to prevent this process gets all memory. Seeing this situation I was asking myself, if I missed a memory configuration. Running SSIS, SSAS and SSRS on one machine some memory assignments perhaps could increase performance. Do you have an idea what is happening here? Regards, Marc |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
SSAS use the memory he need. so you can be surprised by the memory usage, but if its what the system required, you don't need more. remember that AS2005 don't load in memory all the dimensions and their members like AS2000 do. so the system load in memory information only when required. also there is advanced options in SSAS to manage the memory (min, max values etc...) so you can take a look here, but its not recommanded to change these parameters. from what I see in my deployments, SQL Server + SSAS + SSIS on the same box works really fine and the memory is correctly shared between the applications regarding which one required more ressources. so wait and see if you suffer performance issues "Marc" <Roger_Rombooth (AT) community (DOT) nospam> wrote in message news:E3B58D70-CF19-45FB-B8FA-972CB9287D5C (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Dear all I implemented a SQL Server 2005 Olap system on a 64bit box with 8GB RAM. As far as I know msmdsrv.exe is the processname of SSAS. This SSAS process uses only 1GB RAM - but there is 2GB of free memory. What I think is strange is that the use of RAM stays with 1GB, even when more people start queries against the cube. I wronly assumed that msmdsrv.exe would claim more memory if the workload rises. With SSIS the situation is different - the process sqlservr.exe gets as much memory as possible. I had set a max. inside SQL Management Studio to prevent this process gets all memory. Seeing this situation I was asking myself, if I missed a memory configuration. Running SSIS, SSAS and SSRS on one machine some memory assignments perhaps could increase performance. Do you have an idea what is happening here? Regards, Marc |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, My AS (SQL 2005 9.00.2175.00 SP1 Enterprise Edition) is using huge amount of memory ~ 2 GB. Does it have memory leak? Do you familiar with any hot fix that might fix this? Thanks, Shay "Jéjé" wrote: SSAS use the memory he need. so you can be surprised by the memory usage, but if its what the system required, you don't need more. remember that AS2005 don't load in memory all the dimensions and their members like AS2000 do. so the system load in memory information only when required. also there is advanced options in SSAS to manage the memory (min, max values etc...) so you can take a look here, but its not recommanded to change these parameters. from what I see in my deployments, SQL Server + SSAS + SSIS on the same box works really fine and the memory is correctly shared between the applications regarding which one required more ressources. so wait and see if you suffer performance issues "Marc" <Roger_Rombooth (AT) community (DOT) nospam> wrote in message news:E3B58D70-CF19-45FB-B8FA-972CB9287D5C (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Dear all I implemented a SQL Server 2005 Olap system on a 64bit box with 8GB RAM. As far as I know msmdsrv.exe is the processname of SSAS. This SSAS process uses only 1GB RAM - but there is 2GB of free memory. What I think is strange is that the use of RAM stays with 1GB, even when more people start queries against the cube. I wronly assumed that msmdsrv.exe would claim more memory if the workload rises. With SSIS the situation is different - the process sqlservr.exe gets as much memory as possible. I had set a max. inside SQL Management Studio to prevent this process gets all memory. Seeing this situation I was asking myself, if I missed a memory configuration. Running SSIS, SSAS and SSRS on one machine some memory assignments perhaps could increase performance. Do you have an idea what is happening here? Regards, Marc |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, My AS (SQL 2005 9.00.2175.00 SP1 Enterprise Edition) is using huge amount of memory ~ 2 GB. Does it have memory leak? Do you familiar with any hot fix that might fix this? Thanks, Shay "Jéjé" wrote: SSAS use the memory he need. so you can be surprised by the memory usage, but if its what the system required, you don't need more. remember that AS2005 don't load in memory all the dimensions and their members like AS2000 do. so the system load in memory information only when required. also there is advanced options in SSAS to manage the memory (min, max values etc...) so you can take a look here, but its not recommanded to change these parameters. from what I see in my deployments, SQL Server + SSAS + SSIS on the same box works really fine and the memory is correctly shared between the applications regarding which one required more ressources. so wait and see if you suffer performance issues "Marc" <Roger_Rombooth (AT) community (DOT) nospam> wrote in message news:E3B58D70-CF19-45FB-B8FA-972CB9287D5C (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Dear all I implemented a SQL Server 2005 Olap system on a 64bit box with 8GB RAM. As far as I know msmdsrv.exe is the processname of SSAS. This SSAS process uses only 1GB RAM - but there is 2GB of free memory. What I think is strange is that the use of RAM stays with 1GB, even when more people start queries against the cube. I wronly assumed that msmdsrv.exe would claim more memory if the workload rises. With SSIS the situation is different - the process sqlservr.exe gets as much memory as possible. I had set a max. inside SQL Management Studio to prevent this process gets all memory. Seeing this situation I was asking myself, if I missed a memory configuration. Running SSIS, SSAS and SSRS on one machine some memory assignments perhaps could increase performance. Do you have an idea what is happening here? Regards, Marc |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |