![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm experiencing some performance issues with a local cube. The cube file is about 40Mb. (Not that big...) My cube does contain a lot of calculated measures and custom members. So I thought that this was the problem. But when creating a local cube with only measures (nothing calculated) it's still the same. If I have one measure on screen, the performance is acceptable. But I need at least 3 measures to be able to work. Can anyone tell me what I can do to speed this up? When creating a local cube does he take the aggregations from the online cube? regards, Nico |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm experiencing some performance issues with a local cube. The cube file is about 40Mb. (Not that big...) My cube does contain a lot of calculated measures and custom members. So I thought that this was the problem. But when creating a local cube with only measures (nothing calculated) it's still the same. If I have one measure on screen, the performance is acceptable. But I need at least 3 measures to be able to work. Can anyone tell me what I can do to speed this up? When creating a local cube does he take the aggregations from the online cube? regards, Nico |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I made a 'small' error in my description of the problem. The local cube file is between 2 and 4 MB. Not 40... "verbani" wrote: I'm experiencing some performance issues with a local cube. The cube file is about 40Mb. (Not that big...) My cube does contain a lot of calculated measures and custom members. So I thought that this was the problem. But when creating a local cube with only measures (nothing calculated) it's still the same. If I have one measure on screen, the performance is acceptable. But I need at least 3 measures to be able to work. Can anyone tell me what I can do to speed this up? When creating a local cube does he take the aggregations from the online cube? regards, Nico |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
OK, 2-4Mb is quite small and I would have expected performance not to be a problem at that scale. What queries are you running against the cube? How big are your dimensions? "verbani" wrote: I made a 'small' error in my description of the problem. The local cube file is between 2 and 4 MB. Not 40... "verbani" wrote: I'm experiencing some performance issues with a local cube. The cube file is about 40Mb. (Not that big...) My cube does contain a lot of calculated measures and custom members. So I thought that this was the problem. But when creating a local cube with only measures (nothing calculated) it's still the same. If I have one measure on screen, the performance is acceptable. But I need at least 3 measures to be able to work. Can anyone tell me what I can do to speed this up? When creating a local cube does he take the aggregations from the online cube? regards, Nico |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |