dbTalk Databases Forums  

Linked Dimensions

microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap


Discuss Linked Dimensions in the microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Ron Van Zanten
 
Posts: n/a

Default Linked Dimensions - 11-22-2005 , 04:14 PM






I have a best practices question. I am playing around with Linked dimensions.
My thinking is that we could develop a cube that has all of the common
dimensions in our DW (time,account,person,etc...) in a cube and have linked
dimensions to the other cubes that need those demensions. My thinking is that
this would allow us to maintain only one dimenision and if needed when we
modify that dimension it would propogate through all of our cubes. This would
also allow for a consistant look and feel for the cubes that have common
dimensions.

However, it seems to be kinda of a struggle to keep consistancy with the
data source views for each of the "client" cubes. Also, I am concerned about
other unknown issues that could come up.
What does everybody think? Bad idea?

Ron

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Darren Gosbell
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Linked Dimensions - 11-22-2005 , 07:37 PM






I thing a more typical usage pattern would be to have one cube, with all
the common dimensions in it and multiple measure groups. The on top of
that to provide easier browsing you would have multiple perspectives.

--
Regards
Darren Gosbell [MCSD]
Blog: http://www.geekswithblogs.net/darrengosbell

In article <C4D9A3BD-546B-4006-93BE-87EC66B6521E (AT) microsoft (DOT) com>,
RonVanZanten (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com says...
Quote:
I have a best practices question. I am playing around with Linked dimensions.
My thinking is that we could develop a cube that has all of the common
dimensions in our DW (time,account,person,etc...) in a cube and have linked
dimensions to the other cubes that need those demensions. My thinking is that
this would allow us to maintain only one dimenision and if needed when we
modify that dimension it would propogate through all of our cubes. This would
also allow for a consistant look and feel for the cubes that have common
dimensions.

However, it seems to be kinda of a struggle to keep consistancy with the
data source views for each of the "client" cubes. Also, I am concerned about
other unknown issues that could come up.
What does everybody think? Bad idea?

Ron



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.