![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a dimension Customer for whom all members use unary operator ~. The fact table links directly to this dimension. everything is working well, except for the all level. The All level should be the combined total of 2 of the members. I define the all member formula to be the following: Aggregate({[Customer].[Segment Name].&[member1],[Customer].[Segment Name].&[member2]}) however is get all zeros for the all level. even if I define the all member formula to be "1", i still get all zeros uponw reprocessing. It seems as if the all level formula is being ignored. ideas? Thanks Paul |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm not sure whether it is bug or by design. This is not best answer but you can get the results you want by using calculated cells. Ohjoo Kwon "Paul" <Paul (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:7E50E647-9BAC-485F-B7BC-3E0C8BC28416 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... I have a dimension Customer for whom all members use unary operator ~. The fact table links directly to this dimension. everything is working well, except for the all level. The All level should be the combined total of 2 of the members. I define the all member formula to be the following: Aggregate({[Customer].[Segment Name].&[member1],[Customer].[Segment Name].&[member2]}) however is get all zeros for the all level. even if I define the all member formula to be "1", i still get all zeros uponw reprocessing. It seems as if the all level formula is being ignored. ideas? Thanks Paul |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |