![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello, I have 15 measures and would like to produce reports which have weeks as the rows and a) the current years measure b) the previous year's measure c) current year's measure less the previous year's measure as columns. Some reports would only have only 1 measure whereas others would have 2 or 3 measures. Would you define 15 new measures for the previous year's measures and 15 new measures for the differences? Is this the best approach? Thanks Gary Thanks Gary |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Gary, No, as I think you suspect, creating 15 calculated measures for each real measure when you only want to compare current and previous year values is not the most efficient way to approach the problem. What you need is a 'time utility dimension', described in chapter 11 of 'MDX Solutions' by George Spofford; if you don't have the book, search for his postings on this ng where he discusses them, eg http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF- 8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=3D66285F.F69BE1E5% |
|
HTH, Chris "GBillins" <gbillins (AT) petvalu (DOT) com> wrote Hello, I have 15 measures and would like to produce reports which have weeks as the rows and a) the current years measure b) the previous year's measure c) current year's measure less the previous year's measure as columns. Some reports would only have only 1 measure whereas others would have 2 or 3 measures. Would you define 15 new measures for the previous year's measures and 15 new measures for the differences? Is this the best approach? Thanks Gary Thanks Gary . |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |