dbTalk Databases Forums  

Autoexist

microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap


Discuss Autoexist in the microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Resho
 
Posts: n/a

Default Autoexist - 05-18-2005 , 01:22 PM






Hello All,
We have cube that have following dimensions:
Customers, Products and Segments
Each customer can have a different segment for each product. Since star or
snowflake schemas do not support this type of relationship we just
implemented Segment dimension as an independant dimension. although ugly,
this solution works as long as non empty keyword is used in mdx queries.
Fact table contains both product, customer and segment id's.
Could somebody explain me if this type of design is supported in yukon (or
an alternative way in AS 2000) through many-to-many dimensions.

great thanks,

Resho

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Andrej Hudoklin
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Autoexist - 05-19-2005 , 07:52 AM






Hi,

in Yukon this is solved, as we are not talking about star or snowflake
schemas but we are talking about relational schema.
You can import a relational schema of your source database and you can even
have more than 1 fact table in 1 cube (better to call Analysis Services
project) and then you can solve this kind of problem by making Perspectives,
which offers you different kind of views on the data.

Very cool stuff and must try!

HTH,
Andrej



"Resho" <Resho (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote

Quote:
Hello All,
We have cube that have following dimensions:
Customers, Products and Segments
Each customer can have a different segment for each product. Since star or
snowflake schemas do not support this type of relationship we just
implemented Segment dimension as an independant dimension. although ugly,
this solution works as long as non empty keyword is used in mdx queries.
Fact table contains both product, customer and segment id's.
Could somebody explain me if this type of design is supported in yukon (or
an alternative way in AS 2000) through many-to-many dimensions.

great thanks,

Resho



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Resho
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Autoexist - 05-19-2005 , 09:34 AM



Thanks Andrej. I think i was not clear enough to explain my problem.
Perspectives are great however I do want to solve sparsity (or outer-join)
problem. Autoexist feature seems to solve this problem however I'm not sure
if there is a good design technique to use it.
Regards,

Resho

"Andrej Hudoklin" wrote:

Quote:
Hi,

in Yukon this is solved, as we are not talking about star or snowflake
schemas but we are talking about relational schema.
You can import a relational schema of your source database and you can even
have more than 1 fact table in 1 cube (better to call Analysis Services
project) and then you can solve this kind of problem by making Perspectives,
which offers you different kind of views on the data.

Very cool stuff and must try!

HTH,
Andrej



"Resho" <Resho (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:07FDC9F1-740E-405A-A1CD-5ECC9733F08D (AT) microsoft (DOT) com...
Hello All,
We have cube that have following dimensions:
Customers, Products and Segments
Each customer can have a different segment for each product. Since star or
snowflake schemas do not support this type of relationship we just
implemented Segment dimension as an independant dimension. although ugly,
this solution works as long as non empty keyword is used in mdx queries.
Fact table contains both product, customer and segment id's.
Could somebody explain me if this type of design is supported in yukon (or
an alternative way in AS 2000) through many-to-many dimensions.

great thanks,

Resho




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.