![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, This is my setup: I'm using Visual Source Safe for my version control for my AS2005 cubes. I have only 1 AS2005 server. So all the developpers use the same target server. everytime a developper deploy the cubes or part of the solution (like 1 dimension) there is a warning because the version on the server is different (due to a previous deployment by another dev.) Installing AS on each dev. station consume some resources on each station. Do you think this setup is good? or not recommanded? does installing multiple instance on the server is better? anyone can share his experience for a team development around AS2005 cubes? thanks. Jerome. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
It probably makes sense to give each developer separate instance if not possible installing AS on each dev machine. Edward. -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights "Jéjé" <willgart_A_ (AT) hotmail_A_ (DOT) com> wrote in message news:%23ld6CJMLGHA.2416 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP15 (DOT) phx.gbl... Hi, This is my setup: I'm using Visual Source Safe for my version control for my AS2005 cubes. I have only 1 AS2005 server. So all the developpers use the same target server. everytime a developper deploy the cubes or part of the solution (like 1 dimension) there is a warning because the version on the server is different (due to a previous deployment by another dev.) Installing AS on each dev. station consume some resources on each station. Do you think this setup is good? or not recommanded? does installing multiple instance on the server is better? anyone can share his experience for a team development around AS2005 cubes? thanks. Jerome. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I want to centralize my AS server for multiple reasons: * cost to upgrade each dev. desktop to support all the tools (client; server; office...) * processing time: slow other the 100mbps network; better other the 1Gbps server(s) side; also my server use more memory, better disks (Raid 0+1) and better CPUs (new AMD Opteron dual core x64) - Processing 40 millions of test rows (shared in multiple cubes) takes 10minutes on the server... but giving 1 instance by developper... what is the overhead? How AS manage and release the memory when there is multiple instances? (I mean 5 dev instances; maybe more) "Edward Melomed [MSFT]" <edwardm (AT) norely (DOT) micrsoft.com> wrote in message news:elmrNXSLGHA.3064 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP10 (DOT) phx.gbl... It probably makes sense to give each developer separate instance if not possible installing AS on each dev machine. Edward. -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights "Jéjé" <willgart_A_ (AT) hotmail_A_ (DOT) com> wrote in message news:%23ld6CJMLGHA.2416 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP15 (DOT) phx.gbl... Hi, This is my setup: I'm using Visual Source Safe for my version control for my AS2005 cubes. I have only 1 AS2005 server. So all the developpers use the same target server. everytime a developper deploy the cubes or part of the solution (like 1 dimension) there is a warning because the version on the server is different (due to a previous deployment by another dev.) Installing AS on each dev. station consume some resources on each station. Do you think this setup is good? or not recommanded? does installing multiple instance on the server is better? anyone can share his experience for a team development around AS2005 cubes? thanks. Jerome. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
I want to centralize my AS server for multiple reasons: * cost to upgrade each dev. desktop to support all the tools (client; server; office...) * processing time: slow other the 100mbps network; better other the 1Gbps server(s) side; also my server use more memory, better disks (Raid 0+1) and better CPUs (new AMD Opteron dual core x64) - Processing 40 millions of test rows (shared in multiple cubes) takes 10minutes on the server... but giving 1 instance by developper... what is the overhead? How AS manage and release the memory when there is multiple instances? (I mean 5 dev instances; maybe more) "Edward Melomed [MSFT]" <edwardm (AT) norely (DOT) micrsoft.com> wrote in message news:elmrNXSLGHA.3064 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP10 (DOT) phx.gbl... It probably makes sense to give each developer separate instance if not possible installing AS on each dev machine. Edward. -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights "Jéjé" <willgart_A_ (AT) hotmail_A_ (DOT) com> wrote in message news:%23ld6CJMLGHA.2416 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP15 (DOT) phx.gbl... Hi, This is my setup: I'm using Visual Source Safe for my version control for my AS2005 cubes. I have only 1 AS2005 server. So all the developpers use the same target server. everytime a developper deploy the cubes or part of the solution (like 1 dimension) there is a warning because the version on the server is different (due to a previous deployment by another dev.) Installing AS on each dev. station consume some resources on each station. Do you think this setup is good? or not recommanded? does installing multiple instance on the server is better? anyone can share his experience for a team development around AS2005 cubes? thanks. Jerome. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |