dbTalk Databases Forums  

SQL2K DTS Connection Busy with the results from another command

microsoft.public.sqlserver.dts microsoft.public.sqlserver.dts


Discuss SQL2K DTS Connection Busy with the results from another command in the microsoft.public.sqlserver.dts forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
mrsifteruk
 
Posts: n/a

Default SQL2K DTS Connection Busy with the results from another command - 11-23-2004 , 03:59 AM






?I have a dts package which is run once per day and will fail on 1in6
attempts at execution with the above error. It is running on a dual proc
Win2000 Server, I have been unable to recreate it on a single proc dev
machine.

Is the issue related to the package stucture (we are using multiple strands
of execution coming from a single start point) ie should we be attempting to
reduce the amount of concurrency in the package (either running all steps
linear or by breaking half of the steps out into a subsequent package)

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Darren Green
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SQL2K DTS Connection Busy with the results from another command - 11-23-2004 , 08:00 AM






I haven't seen that error, but if you do want task to run in parallel then
need separate connections. Two tasks trying use the same SQL connection will
result in one being queued behind the other. Maybe in your case this queuing
is not working and the two clash, well that is what the error reads like
although I have never seen this happen myself, I just get queuing.

For preference I don't like to let stuff queue automatically, I'd rather use
workflow to ensure the order of execution, so it is clear to the package
designer/developer what will actually happen at run-time, or just ensure you
have one connection per concurrent task.


--
Darren Green
http://www.sqldts.com

"mrsifteruk" <mrsifteruk (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote

Quote:
?I have a dts package which is run once per day and will fail on 1in6
attempts at execution with the above error. It is running on a dual proc
Win2000 Server, I have been unable to recreate it on a single proc dev
machine.

Is the issue related to the package stucture (we are using multiple
strands
of execution coming from a single start point) ie should we be attempting
to
reduce the amount of concurrency in the package (either running all steps
linear or by breaking half of the steps out into a subsequent package)



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.