![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
hi all !!! this is my scenario (simplified for this post): Source: Informix database with single table with more than 100 hundred MILLIONS of records Destination: SQL2000 with two tables (A and B) Requirement: write a task that reads from the huge Informix table and, depending on conditions on the source row,: * do nothing * transform and write to table A * transform and write to table B The question is: whats the more efficient way to do this ? thanks in advance, ant. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
hi all !!! this is my scenario (simplified for this post): Source: Informix database with single table with more than 100 hundred MILLIONS of records Destination: SQL2000 with two tables (A and B) Requirement: write a task that reads from the huge Informix table and, depending on conditions on the source row,: * do nothing * transform and write to table A * transform and write to table B The question is: whats the more efficient way to do this ? thanks in advance, ant. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
this is my scenario (simplified for this post): Source: Informix database with single table with more than 100 hundred MILLIONS of records Destination: SQL2000 with two tables (A and B) Requirement: write a task that reads from the huge Informix table and, depending on conditions on the source row,: * do nothing * transform and write to table A * transform and write to table B The question is: whats the more efficient way to do this ? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |