My personal preference is to use DTS. Upsizing always seems to blow up in
strange places for me. And...while in development I frequently wind up
refreshing data via the packages from teh Access source tables. Easier to
executea DTS package than re-run the wizard.
--
Kevin Hill
President
3NF Consulting
www.3nf-inc.com/NewsGroups.htm
www.DallasDBAs.com/forum - new DB forum for Dallas/Ft. Worth area DBAs.
"Matt" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote
Quote:
I have many access 97 databases I am trying to put into
SQL. From what I can find, Upsizing the database seems to
be less work in the long run, but I get the "overflow
error", microsoft has an article on this, which says to
use SQL server 7, then convert it into 2000. I do not have
a copy of SQL server 7. Is upsizing a lost cause? should I
just use DTS? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks! |