dbTalk Databases Forums  

DTS, Stored Procs & tempdb Overflow

microsoft.public.sqlserver.dts microsoft.public.sqlserver.dts


Discuss DTS, Stored Procs & tempdb Overflow in the microsoft.public.sqlserver.dts forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
pbrisbine
 
Posts: n/a

Default DTS, Stored Procs & tempdb Overflow - 12-09-2004 , 11:57 AM






OK, here's the situation.

We have a DTS Package that contains about 60 or so steps. Each of these
steps is a call to a stored procedure, passing it some parameters. On
very few occasions (less than 1% of 1%) something happens that puts DTS
(or maybe tempdb) into a wierd state, causing tempdb to continue to
expand until it fills the entire hard drive (at this point tempdb is
over 16 gb).

My question is, has anyone see similar behavior with DTS before?

We have poured over the code, and while not the most efficient, there
are no obvious errors that should cause the tempdb to fill up. My
colleague has reproduced this error and we are currently looking into
it, but I wanted to know if this could be a bug in DTS, or is just very
poorly written T-SQL.

Thanks,

Patrick


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Allan Mitchell
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: DTS, Stored Procs & tempdb Overflow - 12-09-2004 , 01:38 PM






My guess would be poorly written TSQL.

TempDB is used for a whole raft of things and it is not all that uncommon for it to bloat.

Look at your code and see why.

--

Allan Mitchell MCSE,MCDBA, (Microsoft SQL Server MVP)
www.SQLDTS.com - The site for all your DTS needs.
www.SQLIS.com - SQL Server 2005 Integration Services.
www.Konesans.com


"pbrisbine" <patrickbrisbine (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
OK, here's the situation.

We have a DTS Package that contains about 60 or so steps. Each of these
steps is a call to a stored procedure, passing it some parameters. On
very few occasions (less than 1% of 1%) something happens that puts DTS
(or maybe tempdb) into a wierd state, causing tempdb to continue to
expand until it fills the entire hard drive (at this point tempdb is
over 16 gb).

My question is, has anyone see similar behavior with DTS before?

We have poured over the code, and while not the most efficient, there
are no obvious errors that should cause the tempdb to fill up. My
colleague has reproduced this error and we are currently looking into
it, but I wanted to know if this could be a bug in DTS, or is just very
poorly written T-SQL.

Thanks,

Patrick




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.