![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
DTS and sql scripting (TSQL/SP) What are the advantageous of using a DTS package over scripting the tables for data migration needs. We have some architectural decisions to make and would someone to throw light on why one should not use DTS as much as scripting. People at work are DTS alergic. I personally think DTS would be easier to develop other than the learning curve invoved in learning VBScript and that it cannot be executed from cmd. SQL Gurus please help ! Thanks, |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- DTS for me is good because the experience is visual. You can write packages that handle the errors, have precedence constraints, are very dynamic, are fast, embed complex logic and are relativley easy to see which parts fail. When would I not use DTS. I wouldn't use DTS if I wanted to move the whole database. I would use BACKUP and RESTORE -- Allan Mitchell MCSE,MCDBA, (Microsoft SQL Server MVP) www.allisonmitchell.com - Expert SQL Server Consultancy. www.SQLDTS.com - The site for all your DTS needs. I support PASS - the definitive, global community for SQL Server professionals - http://www.sqlpass.org "k" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:788301c402c5$cb7f7fc0$a301280a (AT) phx (DOT) gbl... DTS and sql scripting (TSQL/SP) What are the advantageous of using a DTS package over scripting the tables for data migration needs. We have some architectural decisions to make and would someone to throw light on why one should not use DTS as much as scripting. People at work are DTS alergic. I personally think DTS would be easier to develop other than the learning curve invoved in learning VBScript and that it cannot be executed from cmd. SQL Gurus please help ! Thanks, . |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
We have people in our team who has had difficulties in mirgrating the DTS packages between the different environments. They are afraid to go with DTS for that reason. Is there any documentation link which you can point to, which talks about DTS package migration and configuration issues. Thanks, -----Original Message----- DTS for me is good because the experience is visual. You can write packages that handle the errors, have precedence constraints, are very dynamic, are fast, embed complex logic and are relativley easy to see which parts fail. When would I not use DTS. I wouldn't use DTS if I wanted to move the whole database. I would use BACKUP and RESTORE -- Allan Mitchell MCSE,MCDBA, (Microsoft SQL Server MVP) www.allisonmitchell.com - Expert SQL Server Consultancy. www.SQLDTS.com - The site for all your DTS needs. I support PASS - the definitive, global community for SQL Server professionals - http://www.sqlpass.org "k" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:788301c402c5$cb7f7fc0$a301280a (AT) phx (DOT) gbl... DTS and sql scripting (TSQL/SP) What are the advantageous of using a DTS package over scripting the tables for data migration needs. We have some architectural decisions to make and would someone to throw light on why one should not use DTS as much as scripting. People at work are DTS alergic. I personally think DTS would be easier to develop other than the learning curve invoved in learning VBScript and that it cannot be executed from cmd. SQL Gurus please help ! Thanks, . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |