![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
We have a client who has a package where the main package that call sub-packages within sub-packages etc. They've asked if this structure can create overhead issues due to the number of packages being opened. I haven't seen this listed as a performance concern but ... does someone know what the overhead implications are of opening additional packages? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
We have a client who has a package where the main package that call sub-packages within sub-packages etc. They've asked if this structure can create overhead issues due to the number of packages being opened. I haven't seen this listed as a performance concern but ... does someone know what the overhead implications are of opening additional packages? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
We have three-levels of DTS packages. The first level are called "jobs", which consist entirely of ExecutePackage tasks linked together. (omissis) |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Fred Morrison" <fmorrison (AT) erols (DOT) com> wrote in message news:%23IkJanLSFHA.2860 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP10 (DOT) phx.gbl... We have three-levels of DTS packages. The first level are called "jobs", which consist entirely of ExecutePackage tasks linked together. (omissis) Might I ask how do you manage return status? At present I'm using the "fail-on-first-error" flag to be able to easy set workflow properties in the upward levels (callers). I'd like to be able to let the called package to complete all tasks and at the same time to (easy!) return a failure status to the caller. Can anyone suggest a way to achieve this. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'd like to be able to let the called package to complete all tasks and at the same time to (easy!) return a failure status to the caller. The way I achieve this is to have the calling package check the status of each step in the called package, the child packages are called using ActiveX script and not the 'Execute Package Task' |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |