![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi All, I am looking for an approach to error branching. I have a DTS package with 2 workflows. The primary workflow performs the required task. The first step of the second workflow, which acts as an error branch, has an ActiveX workflow script which checks the status of all steps for an error; if an error is found the step executes, otherwise it retries. when it finds that the last step is completed, it is set to DontExecute and completes. I find that this runs very slowly. If I disable the first step in the error branch, the primary flow runs in 3 minutes. However, with that step enabled the package runs in about 20 minutes! I am looking for a better approach to error branching where I wont have to put an error constraint on every step. Any ideas? Kind Regards, Doug |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Hi All, I am looking for an approach to error branching. I have a DTS package with 2 workflows. The primary workflow performs the required task. The first step of the second workflow, which acts as an error branch, has an ActiveX workflow script which checks the status of all steps for an error; if an error is found the step executes, otherwise it retries. when it finds that the last step is completed, it is set to DontExecute and completes. I find that this runs very slowly. If I disable the first step in the error branch, the primary flow runs in 3 minutes. However, with that step enabled the package runs in about 20 minutes! I am looking for a better approach to error branching where I wont have to put an error constraint on every step. Any ideas? Kind Regards, Doug . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |