![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi I had an old architecture where VC code did a lot of data churning, now I have converted them as DTS tasks. I suddenly realise that the data files get full very soon, there is no great change done from existing arch, except that there is a table that holds ingested data until processing is over Can anyone give me some pointers where and what should be causing the problem. Has anyone faced something similar to the mess that I am in could you give me some reasons why using DTS blows my data file and eats loads of hard disk space thanks in advance jeune |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
What could be happening is that SQL Server is eating space creating work tables. Couple of things that speed thigs up 1. Remove triggers 2. Remove non-essential indexes (reapply afterwards) 3. Insert in batches 4. Change recovery model to SIMPLE. -- ---------------------------- Allan Mitchell (Microsoft SQL Server MVP) MCSE,MCDBA www.SQLDTS.com I support PASS - the definitive, global community for SQL Server professionals - http://www.sqlpass.org "Joe" <joseph.jeune (AT) tfn (DOT) com> wrote in message news:edUt0i5SDHA.2188 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP10 (DOT) phx.gbl... Hi I had an old architecture where VC code did a lot of data churning, now I have converted them as DTS tasks. I suddenly realise that the data files get full very soon, there is no great change done from existing arch, except that there is a table that holds ingested data until processing is over Can anyone give me some pointers where and what should be causing the problem. Has anyone faced something similar to the mess that I am in could you give me some reasons why using DTS blows my data file and eats loads of hard disk space thanks in advance jeune |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Point 1 - 3 are with regards to speed, but my issue is with space. The recovery is simple on the db however. So these points have not actually given me any clue, nor my work overnight on this. Any other clues with regards to eating space since I am not sure how point 1-3 will reduce space utilization Thanks Jeune "Allan Mitchell" <allan (AT) no-spam (DOT) sqldts.com> wrote in message news:uSv73N6SDHA.1992 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP12 (DOT) phx.gbl... What could be happening is that SQL Server is eating space creating work tables. Couple of things that speed thigs up 1. Remove triggers 2. Remove non-essential indexes (reapply afterwards) 3. Insert in batches 4. Change recovery model to SIMPLE. -- ---------------------------- Allan Mitchell (Microsoft SQL Server MVP) MCSE,MCDBA www.SQLDTS.com I support PASS - the definitive, global community for SQL Server professionals - http://www.sqlpass.org "Joe" <joseph.jeune (AT) tfn (DOT) com> wrote in message news:edUt0i5SDHA.2188 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP10 (DOT) phx.gbl... Hi I had an old architecture where VC code did a lot of data churning, now I have converted them as DTS tasks. I suddenly realise that the data files get full very soon, there is no great change done from existing arch, except that there is a table that holds ingested data until processing is over Can anyone give me some pointers where and what should be causing the problem. Has anyone faced something similar to the mess that I am in could you give me some reasons why using DTS blows my data file and eats loads of hard disk space thanks in advance jeune |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |