"SQL server on Solaris" ????
Yes DTS packages should be as maintenance free as possible. That said it is
not always possible to split as easily. Different RDBMSs play slightly
differently to each other and that is where you can come unstuck.
It is relatively easy in DTS to simply change Source Servers/Catalogs if the
underlying table structure is common throughout. You can change all kinds
of properties in the Object Model and through Disconnected Edit. You can
set these at runtime.
If the Question is "Can I build a package that is infinitely dynamic i.e.
suck from different databases, different tables with differing structures
and move to different tables with different structures" then the answer is
"Yes" but with a lot of recreating and messing about.
--
----------------------------
Allan Mitchell MCSE,MCDBA, (Microsoft SQL Server MVP)
www.allisonmitchell.com - Expert SQL Server Consultancy.
www.SQLDTS.com - The site for all your DTS needs.
I support PASS - the definitive, global community
for SQL Server professionals - http://www.sqlpass.org
"Break It" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote
Quote:
Hi,
Ours is a product across multiple platforms and databases - Oracle 8.1.7 ,
9i, SQL server on Solaris, AIX windows etc. I have to make sure that the DTS
|
packages are maintainable. i.e I should not be maintaining multiple DTS
packages - one for each environment.
Quote:
The strategy I have used in DTS is defining the DTS connections as "other
ODBC data source", namely "SOURCE1". SOURCE1 could inturn be any configured
|
to any other ODBC drivers, oracle or SQL server.
Quote:
Is this a right approach ? |