![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi all, Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity to the issue. Thanks in advance, Ville Tuomola |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at the moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but they should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even attempting to use them. -- Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033 (AT) posting (DOT) google.com... Hi all, Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity to the issue. Thanks in advance, Ville Tuomola |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at the moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but they should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even attempting to use them. -- Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033 (AT) posting (DOT) google.com... Hi all, Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity to the issue. Thanks in advance, Ville Tuomola |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks for your reply! But is it risky to test the dll in a 64-bit environment, will it just not work or can it mess the server up? Do you know of any other mail solution that will work for 64-bit? -Ville Tuomola "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam (AT) shadhawk (DOT) com> wrote in message news:<erxaLADvEHA.2564 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP12 (DOT) phx.gbl>... To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at the moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but they should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even attempting to use them. -- Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033 (AT) posting (DOT) google.com... Hi all, Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity to the issue. Thanks in advance, Ville Tuomola |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
You need the 64-bit version of XPSMTP for that. GertD (AT) SQLDev (DOT) Net Please reply only to the newsgroups. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. You assume all risk for your use. Copyright © SQLDev.Net 1991-2004 All rights reserved. "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam (AT) shadhawk (DOT) com> wrote in message news:erxaLADvEHA.2564 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP12 (DOT) phx.gbl... To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at the moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but they should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even attempting to use them. -- Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033 (AT) posting (DOT) google.com... Hi all, Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity to the issue. Thanks in advance, Ville Tuomola |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks for your reply! But is it risky to test the dll in a 64-bit environment, will it just not work or can it mess the server up? Do you know of any other mail solution that will work for 64-bit? -Ville Tuomola "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam (AT) shadhawk (DOT) com> wrote To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at the moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but they should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even attempting to use them. -- Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033 (AT) posting (DOT) google.com... Hi all, Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity to the issue. Thanks in advance, Ville Tuomola |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Ville, Did you find the solution for 64-bit mail? Thanks, Leonid "Ville Tuomola" wrote: Thanks for your reply! But is it risky to test the dll in a 64-bit environment, will it just not work or can it mess the server up? Do you know of any other mail solution that will work for 64-bit? -Ville Tuomola "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam (AT) shadhawk (DOT) com> wrote To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at the moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but they should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even attempting to use them. -- Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033 (AT) posting (DOT) google.com... Hi all, Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity to the issue. Thanks in advance, Ville Tuomola |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |