![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
|From: karensundq (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Karen Sundquist) |Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication,microsoft.p ublic.sqlserver.clustering |Subject: Using merge replication for high availability (in addition to a cluster) |Date: 22 Feb 2004 08:11:58 -0800 |Organization: http://groups.google.com |Lines: 34 |Message-ID: <9999c907.0402220811.48e06b0 (AT) posting (DOT) google.com |NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.165.171.187 |Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit |X-Trace: posting.google.com 1077466318 19117 127.0.0.1 (22 Feb 2004 16:11:58 GMT) |X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse (AT) google (DOT) com |NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 16:11:58 +0000 (UTC) |Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTN GXA05.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08 |
|
|Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering:12966 microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication:47622 |X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering | |Hi there |Are any of you using merge replication to increase the availability of |your sql server? I have a clustered sql server 2000 but I need to |cover for the eventuality of loss of network connection to the |datacenter or other event that would put the cluster offline. | |At first I set up log shipping but the change over process is manual |(I have to get out of bed if it fails during the night). Also, it is |possible to lose some data depending on the frequency of log copies. | |I know replication is not recommended by MS as a failover solution but |it does seem to offer a warmer backup than log shipping and the |possibility of using both servers in a load balanced arrangement. My |application is OLTP but the transactions are not that strict - if we |lose a little data or end up with a half completed transaction |somewhere it's not the end of the world. | |The merge replicated server would sit across a WAN. All hardware |involved is high powered for the load. | |If anyone is successfully running this I'd love to hear about it. | |Otherwise, I guess we could get some 3rd part stretch cluster |solution. Any of you using something like this which allows for |automatic failover across a WAN and costs not more than $100K? | |Final question: the distributor seems to be a single point of failure |in a replicated failover solution; is there a way to set up a failover |distributor? | |Thanks! | | |Karen | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |