![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks Geoff, however my target is not to perform a fail over (although we can use it as so) . i need to install the database servers in two different sites (different physical location connection via the internet VPN ) and i need both servers to answer users requests (read/write). it would be faster for the users to work on a local (same location/site) database instead of connecting to one remote server. can we configure the SQL servers to be both pricipals and replicating their transcations in the same time? thanks , -- G "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote: Sounds like a job for either log shipping or High Performance database mirroring. Both work asycnronously to copy and synchronize databases. Log Shipping overview http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187103.aspx Database Mirroring Overview http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189852.aspx Feel free to come back with some more detailed questions on selection and implementation. -- Geoff N. Hiten Principal SQL Infrastructure Consultant Microsoft SQL Server MVP "GUSS" <GUSS (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:38328584-BF88-4ADA-BD37-1109E306EF0D (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... i want to install an application using SQL 2005 server in two different location where delays (Latency) in communication could be great. how can i install the SQL 2005 on two different servers each with its own database and having the two databases synchronize with each other including all objects and forms? Thanks, G |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |