![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Just wondering if this is correct. I have SQL 2000 set up across a Server 2003 cluster. Say I have PhysicalNode1 and PhysicalNode2 and VirtualServer1. VirtualServer1 is sitting on top of PhysicalNode1 and I go into Enterprise manager and make some configuration settings to SQL server like Default Data/Log directories, boosting SQL server process priority, etc. Within a few minutes the changes I make are wiped out and it's set back to the default. Also, if I switch to PhysicalNode2, VirtualServer1 does not maintain the settings I've added. I've spoken with a MS tech and he claimed that was "By design". Is this true or was he wrong and I have my cluster configured improperly. I know I can go into the registries and hack the changes I want onto each physical node, but that definitely is not something I'd prefer to do. Anyone have a workaround or any thoughts on this? Thanks, Chris |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Are you connected to the virtual server or local instance? joe. "Chris" <Chris (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:02D9DEFF-6604-4A6F-9116-3D341D00CAF5 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Just wondering if this is correct. I have SQL 2000 set up across a Server 2003 cluster. Say I have PhysicalNode1 and PhysicalNode2 and VirtualServer1. VirtualServer1 is sitting on top of PhysicalNode1 and I go into Enterprise manager and make some configuration settings to SQL server like Default Data/Log directories, boosting SQL server process priority, etc. Within a few minutes the changes I make are wiped out and it's set back to the default. Also, if I switch to PhysicalNode2, VirtualServer1 does not maintain the settings I've added. I've spoken with a MS tech and he claimed that was "By design". Is this true or was he wrong and I have my cluster configured improperly. I know I can go into the registries and hack the changes I want onto each physical node, but that definitely is not something I'd prefer to do. Anyone have a workaround or any thoughts on this? Thanks, Chris |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Just wondering if this is correct. I have SQL 2000 set up across a Server 2003 cluster. Say I have PhysicalNode1 and PhysicalNode2 and VirtualServer1. VirtualServer1 is sitting on top of PhysicalNode1 and I go into Enterprise manager and make some configuration settings to SQL server like Default Data/Log directories, boosting SQL server process priority, etc. Within a few minutes the changes I make are wiped out and it's set back to the default. Also, if I switch to PhysicalNode2, VirtualServer1 does not maintain the settings I've added. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |