 | |
SQL Server Named instance with Default Instance
microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: SQL Server Named instance with Default Instance -
03-18-2008
, 11:54 AM
|
I have seen this a lot. We do OCS work all the time and I ahve had to make adjustments to the ridiculous requirements coming from the OCS team. They obviously did not get a real SQL expert to design anything for their back-end database infrastructure. The problem is that each part was developed indepenedently so everyone had local, dedicated database resources. So that is what they want for a real deployment. I am working with out Core Infrastructure OCS guys to come up with some better sback-end sizing guidelines. Meanwhine, for a moderate-sized install, just give them a database on your existing system and tell them to go away. -- Geoff N. Hiten Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant Microsoft SQL Server MVP "Mohit K. Gupta" <mohitkgupta (AT) msn (DOT) com> wrote in message news:7B3BB3A3-3175-4A93-BC44-DCAA209D2A7C (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Hi Folks, We are running SQL Server 2005 Cluster enviornment with single instance-two node configuration. Presently both servers have 4GB ram, with 3.4Ghz 32-bit Quad-Core CPUs on both. Our Network guys are installing Microsoft OCS 2007, and are demanding SQL DBA team install named instance on the cluster enviornment. I have turned them down so far, but wanted to ask everyons opinion on here. Thanks! -- Mohit K. Gupta B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese MCTS: SQL Server 2005 http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/ |
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.