![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
In a two node cluster (active/active), I have installed two SQL Server 2005 instances in order to use both nodes. The virtual server name of the first SQL instance owned by the node A is like SQLN1 (default instance) and the second SQL instance owned by the node B is like SQLN2 with a named instance SQLN2. Now I have seen that it is not possible a default instance for the instance owned by node B with the virtual server name SQLN2, isn't it? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
In a two node cluster (active/active), I have installed two SQL Server 2005 instances in order to use both nodes. The virtual server name of the first SQL instance owned by the node A is like SQLN1 (default instance) and the second SQL instance owned by the node B is like SQLN2 with a named instance SQLN2. Now I have seen that it is not possible a default instance for the instance owned by node B with the virtual server name SQLN2, isn't it? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
In a two node cluster (active/active), I have installed two SQL Server 2005 instances in order to use both nodes. The virtual server name of the first SQL instance owned by the node A is like SQLN1 (default instance) and the second SQL instance owned by the node B is like SQLN2 with a named instance SQLN2. Now I have seen that it is not possible a default instance for the instance owned by node B with the virtual server name SQLN2, isn't it? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
In a two node cluster (active/active), I have installed two SQL Server 2005 instances in order to use both nodes. The virtual server name of the first SQL instance owned by the node A is like SQLN1 (default instance) and the second SQL instance owned by the node B is like SQLN2 with a named instance SQLN2. Now I have seen that it is not possible a default instance for the instance owned by node B with the virtual server name SQLN2, isn't it? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
In a two node cluster (active/active), I have installed two SQL Server 2005 instances in order to use both nodes. The virtual server name of the first SQL instance owned by the node A is like SQLN1 (default instance) and the second SQL instance owned by the node B is like SQLN2 with a named instance SQLN2. Now I have seen that it is not possible a default instance for the instance owned by node B with the virtual server name SQLN2, isn't it? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
In a two node cluster (active/active), I have installed two SQL Server 2005 instances in order to use both nodes. The virtual server name of the first SQL instance owned by the node A is like SQLN1 (default instance) and the second SQL instance owned by the node B is like SQLN2 with a named instance SQLN2. Now I have seen that it is not possible a default instance for the instance owned by node B with the virtual server name SQLN2, isn't it? |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
In a two node cluster (active/active), I have installed two SQL Server 2005 instances in order to use both nodes. The virtual server name of the first SQL instance owned by the node A is like SQLN1 (default instance) and the second SQL instance owned by the node B is like SQLN2 with a named instance SQLN2. Now I have seen that it is not possible a default instance for the instance owned by node B with the virtual server name SQLN2, isn't it? |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
In a two node cluster (active/active), I have installed two SQL Server 2005 instances in order to use both nodes. The virtual server name of the first SQL instance owned by the node A is like SQLN1 (default instance) and the second SQL instance owned by the node B is like SQLN2 with a named instance SQLN2. Now I have seen that it is not possible a default instance for the instance owned by node B with the virtual server name SQLN2, isn't it? |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
In a two node cluster (active/active), I have installed two SQL Server 2005 instances in order to use both nodes. The virtual server name of the first SQL instance owned by the node A is like SQLN1 (default instance) and the second SQL instance owned by the node B is like SQLN2 with a named instance SQLN2. Now I have seen that it is not possible a default instance for the instance owned by node B with the virtual server name SQLN2, isn't it? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |