![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? |
|
All: I have a 6 yr old SQL2000 server running on Win2000. I have two brand new HP DL380G5 servers that were ditched from another project which have six 72 GB HDD's - two mirrored for the OS, and four RAID5'd for the data for a total of 136GB. I have access to two licenses of SQL2005 and two Win2003 Enterprise Edition licenses. I do not have access to a SAN. I have been tasked with setting up these two machines so that the data is mirrored, and preferably, given the hardware stated - automatic failover. Everything I have been reading so far states that for clustering, automatic failover, and mirroring to properly work together, that it is necessary to store all data that your machines will access need to be stored on a SAN. Is there any way around this, other than: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304261 Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? Thanks |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? |
|
All: I have a 6 yr old SQL2000 server running on Win2000. I have two brand new HP DL380G5 servers that were ditched from another project which have six 72 GB HDD's - two mirrored for the OS, and four RAID5'd for the data for a total of 136GB. I have access to two licenses of SQL2005 and two Win2003 Enterprise Edition licenses. I do not have access to a SAN. I have been tasked with setting up these two machines so that the data is mirrored, and preferably, given the hardware stated - automatic failover. Everything I have been reading so far states that for clustering, automatic failover, and mirroring to properly work together, that it is necessary to store all data that your machines will access need to be stored on a SAN. Is there any way around this, other than: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304261 Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? Thanks |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? |
|
All: I have a 6 yr old SQL2000 server running on Win2000. I have two brand new HP DL380G5 servers that were ditched from another project which have six 72 GB HDD's - two mirrored for the OS, and four RAID5'd for the data for a total of 136GB. I have access to two licenses of SQL2005 and two Win2003 Enterprise Edition licenses. I do not have access to a SAN. I have been tasked with setting up these two machines so that the data is mirrored, and preferably, given the hardware stated - automatic failover. Everything I have been reading so far states that for clustering, automatic failover, and mirroring to properly work together, that it is necessary to store all data that your machines will access need to be stored on a SAN. Is there any way around this, other than: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304261 Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? Thanks |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? |
|
All: I have a 6 yr old SQL2000 server running on Win2000. I have two brand new HP DL380G5 servers that were ditched from another project which have six 72 GB HDD's - two mirrored for the OS, and four RAID5'd for the data for a total of 136GB. I have access to two licenses of SQL2005 and two Win2003 Enterprise Edition licenses. I do not have access to a SAN. I have been tasked with setting up these two machines so that the data is mirrored, and preferably, given the hardware stated - automatic failover. Everything I have been reading so far states that for clustering, automatic failover, and mirroring to properly work together, that it is necessary to store all data that your machines will access need to be stored on a SAN. Is there any way around this, other than: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304261 Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? Thanks |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? |
|
All: I have a 6 yr old SQL2000 server running on Win2000. I have two brand new HP DL380G5 servers that were ditched from another project which have six 72 GB HDD's - two mirrored for the OS, and four RAID5'd for the data for a total of 136GB. I have access to two licenses of SQL2005 and two Win2003 Enterprise Edition licenses. I do not have access to a SAN. I have been tasked with setting up these two machines so that the data is mirrored, and preferably, given the hardware stated - automatic failover. Everything I have been reading so far states that for clustering, automatic failover, and mirroring to properly work together, that it is necessary to store all data that your machines will access need to be stored on a SAN. Is there any way around this, other than: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304261 Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? Thanks |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? |
|
All: I have a 6 yr old SQL2000 server running on Win2000. I have two brand new HP DL380G5 servers that were ditched from another project which have six 72 GB HDD's - two mirrored for the OS, and four RAID5'd for the data for a total of 136GB. I have access to two licenses of SQL2005 and two Win2003 Enterprise Edition licenses. I do not have access to a SAN. I have been tasked with setting up these two machines so that the data is mirrored, and preferably, given the hardware stated - automatic failover. Everything I have been reading so far states that for clustering, automatic failover, and mirroring to properly work together, that it is necessary to store all data that your machines will access need to be stored on a SAN. Is there any way around this, other than: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304261 Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? Thanks |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? |
|
All: I have a 6 yr old SQL2000 server running on Win2000. I have two brand new HP DL380G5 servers that were ditched from another project which have six 72 GB HDD's - two mirrored for the OS, and four RAID5'd for the data for a total of 136GB. I have access to two licenses of SQL2005 and two Win2003 Enterprise Edition licenses. I do not have access to a SAN. I have been tasked with setting up these two machines so that the data is mirrored, and preferably, given the hardware stated - automatic failover. Everything I have been reading so far states that for clustering, automatic failover, and mirroring to properly work together, that it is necessary to store all data that your machines will access need to be stored on a SAN. Is there any way around this, other than: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304261 Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? Thanks |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? |
|
All: I have a 6 yr old SQL2000 server running on Win2000. I have two brand new HP DL380G5 servers that were ditched from another project which have six 72 GB HDD's - two mirrored for the OS, and four RAID5'd for the data for a total of 136GB. I have access to two licenses of SQL2005 and two Win2003 Enterprise Edition licenses. I do not have access to a SAN. I have been tasked with setting up these two machines so that the data is mirrored, and preferably, given the hardware stated - automatic failover. Everything I have been reading so far states that for clustering, automatic failover, and mirroring to properly work together, that it is necessary to store all data that your machines will access need to be stored on a SAN. Is there any way around this, other than: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304261 Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? Thanks |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? |
|
All: I have a 6 yr old SQL2000 server running on Win2000. I have two brand new HP DL380G5 servers that were ditched from another project which have six 72 GB HDD's - two mirrored for the OS, and four RAID5'd for the data for a total of 136GB. I have access to two licenses of SQL2005 and two Win2003 Enterprise Edition licenses. I do not have access to a SAN. I have been tasked with setting up these two machines so that the data is mirrored, and preferably, given the hardware stated - automatic failover. Everything I have been reading so far states that for clustering, automatic failover, and mirroring to properly work together, that it is necessary to store all data that your machines will access need to be stored on a SAN. Is there any way around this, other than: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304261 Specifically, is it possible to set up two machines to support clustering/failover by using the local drives on each machine for their data source? Thanks |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |