![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi all, I was wondering if any of you could offer me some help with my cluster. I've been dropped in the deep end and currently experiencing a serious 'in the deep end' moment. We have the requirement to emulate a setup whereby two (or more) machines are going to be clustered together to run SQL Server as a cluster service for numerous web servers. We have little to no experience in-house for this kind of configuration, only plain SQL Server installations previously. So far I have managed to install Windows Server 2003 Enterprise on both machines and create a cluster consisting of them both. Without a disk capable of connecting to both machines at once I have opted for a majority node set since this allows two nodes with their own disk resources. (Was this the right choice?) The cluster seems to be up and running without any problems, except for a warning that only one NIC is present and is a single point of failure. I'm not too worried about this since we're not going to be in a production environment. When installing SQL Server 2000 Developer Edition everything progresses just fine when I specify a new Virtual Server and move through to picking an IP for it. On the next screen, though, it asks for the cluster disk where the files will be placed... this screen has no disks to choose from so I cannot progress any further with the installation. Can anyone suggest where I might have gone wrong or what I should do to resolve the problem? I should admit that this is the first time I've tried to cluster two machines and install SQL Server in a clustered environment and I'm trying to learn using only pages I find on the Internet. However, I do have a good understanding of Windows environments in general. Any help is gratefully received! Thanks! Richard. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Rod, Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. Is there a specific reason why SQL Server 2000 doesn't work on MSNC other than it was produced three years before Windows Server 2003 came out? Is there a knowledgebase entry about this because I failed to find one whilst searching for hours and hours. ;o) Cheers! Richard. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Rod, Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. Is there a specific reason why SQL Server 2000 doesn't work on MSNC other than it was produced three years before Windows Server 2003 came out? Is there a knowledgebase entry about this because I failed to find one whilst searching for hours and hours. ;o) Cheers! Richard. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
I was wondering if any of you could offer me some help with my cluster. I've been dropped in the deep end and currently experiencing a serious 'in the deep end' moment. We have the requirement to emulate a setup whereby two (or more) machines are going to be clustered together to run SQL Server as a cluster service for numerous web servers. We have little to no experience in-house for this kind of configuration, only plain SQL Server installations previously. So far I have managed to install Windows Server 2003 Enterprise on both machines and create a cluster consisting of them both. Without a disk capable of connecting to both machines at once I have opted for a majority node set since this allows two nodes with their own disk resources. (Was this the right choice?) When runninng a MNS cluster you need to have a minimum of two nodes running |
|
When installing SQL Server 2000 Developer Edition everything progresses just fine |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |