dbTalk Databases Forums  

Scaling Out - the Future

microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering


Discuss Scaling Out - the Future in the microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
CLM
 
Posts: n/a

Default Scaling Out - the Future - 11-26-2007 , 03:42 PM






You guys just posted that there is no true Scale Out technology with SS. But
I am curious: does MS have anything in the works? Are there any rumors?

I'm wondering because I get Unix and Oracle guys constantly telling me that
Windows can't scale out because of inherent file and threading limitations.
Is that true?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Geoff N. Hiten
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Scaling Out - the Future - 11-26-2007 , 04:25 PM






One of these days, the Unix and Oracle guys should try something more recent
than Windows 95. They might be surprised.

Seriously, I have seen some truly massive SQL installations with very high
processing throughput. Given similar budgets, I can build a SQL system that
can match pretty much any Oracle system for scalability. Even the
much-vaunted RAC has scalability issues on most real-world workloads.

As for what Microsoft has in the long-term back room, your guess is as good
as mine. I would be very surprised if there wasn't something bubbling on a
back burner somewhere they don't tell anyone about. Mainly because:

1) They can see what the competition is doing.
2) They ain't stupid.
3) They can afford it.

--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP



"CLM" <CLM (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote

Quote:
You guys just posted that there is no true Scale Out technology with SS.
But
I am curious: does MS have anything in the works? Are there any rumors?

I'm wondering because I get Unix and Oracle guys constantly telling me
that
Windows can't scale out because of inherent file and threading
limitations.
Is that true?


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Linchi Shea
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Scaling Out - the Future - 11-26-2007 , 04:48 PM



This issue comes up so often it's not even funny any more. Comments in line.

Linchi

"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:

Quote:
One of these days, the Unix and Oracle guys should try something more recent
than Windows 95. They might be surprised.

Seriously, I have seen some truly massive SQL installations with very high
processing throughput. Given similar budgets, I can build a SQL system that
can match pretty much any Oracle system for scalability. Even the
much-vaunted RAC has scalability issues on most real-world workloads.
Be that the case, the issue is whether you do it 'manually' or let the DBMS
do it for you. I've seen enough problems with RAC, and not a particular fan
of it. But there is an absolute need for scale-out at the DBMS level.

And a lot of times, it is not even a technology question. Without a
scale-out solution, it creates a throny perception problem which gets in the
way when one should be spending time on something else.

Quote:
As for what Microsoft has in the long-term back room, your guess is as good
as mine. I would be very surprised if there wasn't something bubbling on a
back burner somewhere they don't tell anyone about.
Hopefully, it's not on the back burner. And hopefully it's not even on the
front burner. Rather, the burner should be underneath their feet on this
issue. Even Sybase will be releasing its Adaptive Server Enterprise Cluster
Edition in Q1 of 2008, and it is a shared-disk cluster.

Quote:
Mainly because:

1) They can see what the competition is doing.
2) They ain't stupid.
3) They can afford it.

--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP



"CLM" <CLM (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:CC042BF8-97F0-451F-AC6D-085108544CC7 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com...
You guys just posted that there is no true Scale Out technology with SS.
But
I am curious: does MS have anything in the works? Are there any rumors?

I'm wondering because I get Unix and Oracle guys constantly telling me
that
Windows can't scale out because of inherent file and threading
limitations.
Is that true?



Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
CLM
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Scaling Out - the Future - 11-26-2007 , 05:21 PM



Interesting comments from both of you - thx.

"Linchi Shea" wrote:

Quote:
This issue comes up so often it's not even funny any more. Comments in line.

Linchi

"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:

One of these days, the Unix and Oracle guys should try something more recent
than Windows 95. They might be surprised.

Seriously, I have seen some truly massive SQL installations with very high
processing throughput. Given similar budgets, I can build a SQL system that
can match pretty much any Oracle system for scalability. Even the
much-vaunted RAC has scalability issues on most real-world workloads.

Be that the case, the issue is whether you do it 'manually' or let the DBMS
do it for you. I've seen enough problems with RAC, and not a particular fan
of it. But there is an absolute need for scale-out at the DBMS level.

And a lot of times, it is not even a technology question. Without a
scale-out solution, it creates a throny perception problem which gets in the
way when one should be spending time on something else.


As for what Microsoft has in the long-term back room, your guess is as good
as mine. I would be very surprised if there wasn't something bubbling on a
back burner somewhere they don't tell anyone about.

Hopefully, it's not on the back burner. And hopefully it's not even on the
front burner. Rather, the burner should be underneath their feet on this
issue. Even Sybase will be releasing its Adaptive Server Enterprise Cluster
Edition in Q1 of 2008, and it is a shared-disk cluster.

Mainly because:

1) They can see what the competition is doing.
2) They ain't stupid.
3) They can afford it.

--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP



"CLM" <CLM (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:CC042BF8-97F0-451F-AC6D-085108544CC7 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com...
You guys just posted that there is no true Scale Out technology with SS.
But
I am curious: does MS have anything in the works? Are there any rumors?

I'm wondering because I get Unix and Oracle guys constantly telling me
that
Windows can't scale out because of inherent file and threading
limitations.
Is that true?



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.