![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thread-Topic: Restarting the SQL Server Service thread-index: Aciag9cgwVNDyE1YTgK56B52hTZLaA== X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 207.46.19.168 From: =?Utf-8?B?U2VhbiBTbmlkZXI=?= <SeanSnider (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com Subject: Restarting the SQL Server Service Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:54:02 -0700 Lines: 6 Message-ID: <FDF9E047-91A0-4BDB-969A-60CB1DE481A2 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992 Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering:2991 NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149 X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Are there any reasons why the SQL Server Service of an SQL Server 2005 Cluster (active/passive), should not be restarted using Management Studio? Is there any reason why the SQL Server Cluster should be taken offline before restarting the service? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thread-Topic: Restarting the SQL Server Service thread-index: Aciag9cgwVNDyE1YTgK56B52hTZLaA== X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 207.46.19.168 From: =?Utf-8?B?U2VhbiBTbmlkZXI=?= <SeanSnider (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com Subject: Restarting the SQL Server Service Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:54:02 -0700 Lines: 6 Message-ID: <FDF9E047-91A0-4BDB-969A-60CB1DE481A2 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992 Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering:2991 NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149 X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Are there any reasons why the SQL Server Service of an SQL Server 2005 Cluster (active/passive), should not be restarted using Management Studio? Is there any reason why the SQL Server Cluster should be taken offline before restarting the service? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thread-Topic: Restarting the SQL Server Service thread-index: Aciag9cgwVNDyE1YTgK56B52hTZLaA== X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 207.46.19.168 From: =?Utf-8?B?U2VhbiBTbmlkZXI=?= <SeanSnider (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com Subject: Restarting the SQL Server Service Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:54:02 -0700 Lines: 6 Message-ID: <FDF9E047-91A0-4BDB-969A-60CB1DE481A2 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992 Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering:2991 NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149 X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Are there any reasons why the SQL Server Service of an SQL Server 2005 Cluster (active/passive), should not be restarted using Management Studio? Is there any reason why the SQL Server Cluster should be taken offline before restarting the service? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thread-Topic: Restarting the SQL Server Service thread-index: Aciag9cgwVNDyE1YTgK56B52hTZLaA== X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 207.46.19.168 From: =?Utf-8?B?U2VhbiBTbmlkZXI=?= <SeanSnider (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com Subject: Restarting the SQL Server Service Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:54:02 -0700 Lines: 6 Message-ID: <FDF9E047-91A0-4BDB-969A-60CB1DE481A2 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992 Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering:2991 NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149 X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Are there any reasons why the SQL Server Service of an SQL Server 2005 Cluster (active/passive), should not be restarted using Management Studio? Is there any reason why the SQL Server Cluster should be taken offline before restarting the service? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thread-Topic: Restarting the SQL Server Service thread-index: Aciag9cgwVNDyE1YTgK56B52hTZLaA== X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 207.46.19.168 From: =?Utf-8?B?U2VhbiBTbmlkZXI=?= <SeanSnider (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com Subject: Restarting the SQL Server Service Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:54:02 -0700 Lines: 6 Message-ID: <FDF9E047-91A0-4BDB-969A-60CB1DE481A2 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992 Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering:2991 NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149 X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Are there any reasons why the SQL Server Service of an SQL Server 2005 Cluster (active/passive), should not be restarted using Management Studio? Is there any reason why the SQL Server Cluster should be taken offline before restarting the service? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thread-Topic: Restarting the SQL Server Service thread-index: Aciag9cgwVNDyE1YTgK56B52hTZLaA== X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 207.46.19.168 From: =?Utf-8?B?U2VhbiBTbmlkZXI=?= <SeanSnider (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com Subject: Restarting the SQL Server Service Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:54:02 -0700 Lines: 6 Message-ID: <FDF9E047-91A0-4BDB-969A-60CB1DE481A2 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992 Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering:2991 NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149 X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Are there any reasons why the SQL Server Service of an SQL Server 2005 Cluster (active/passive), should not be restarted using Management Studio? Is there any reason why the SQL Server Cluster should be taken offline before restarting the service? |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thread-Topic: Restarting the SQL Server Service thread-index: Aciag9cgwVNDyE1YTgK56B52hTZLaA== X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 207.46.19.168 From: =?Utf-8?B?U2VhbiBTbmlkZXI=?= <SeanSnider (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com Subject: Restarting the SQL Server Service Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:54:02 -0700 Lines: 6 Message-ID: <FDF9E047-91A0-4BDB-969A-60CB1DE481A2 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992 Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering:2991 NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149 X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Are there any reasons why the SQL Server Service of an SQL Server 2005 Cluster (active/passive), should not be restarted using Management Studio? Is there any reason why the SQL Server Cluster should be taken offline before restarting the service? |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thread-Topic: Restarting the SQL Server Service thread-index: Aciag9cgwVNDyE1YTgK56B52hTZLaA== X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 207.46.19.168 From: =?Utf-8?B?U2VhbiBTbmlkZXI=?= <SeanSnider (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com Subject: Restarting the SQL Server Service Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:54:02 -0700 Lines: 6 Message-ID: <FDF9E047-91A0-4BDB-969A-60CB1DE481A2 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992 Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering:2991 NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149 X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Are there any reasons why the SQL Server Service of an SQL Server 2005 Cluster (active/passive), should not be restarted using Management Studio? Is there any reason why the SQL Server Cluster should be taken offline before restarting the service? |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thread-Topic: Restarting the SQL Server Service thread-index: Aciag9cgwVNDyE1YTgK56B52hTZLaA== X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 207.46.19.168 From: =?Utf-8?B?U2VhbiBTbmlkZXI=?= <SeanSnider (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com Subject: Restarting the SQL Server Service Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:54:02 -0700 Lines: 6 Message-ID: <FDF9E047-91A0-4BDB-969A-60CB1DE481A2 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992 Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering:2991 NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149 X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering Are there any reasons why the SQL Server Service of an SQL Server 2005 Cluster (active/passive), should not be restarted using Management Studio? Is there any reason why the SQL Server Cluster should be taken offline before restarting the service? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |