First, if there is more than one virtual server on a cluster, the entire
cluster is down if the first instance goes offline.
Second, the quorum drive needs to have little or no contention for writes,
otherwise the cluster can bet badly out of synch and become unstable.
There are more benefits to having the quorum on a separate drive than any
other clustered data, but these two alone should be enough. The entire
point of a cluster is high availability and sharing the quorum with virtual
server instance takes away most of the advantages.
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Senior Database Administrator
Careerbuilder.com
I support the Professional Association for SQL Server
www.sqlpass.org
"mdh333" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote
Quote:
What is the reason for wanting the quorom drive on a seperate physical
drive than the data drive for SQL Server?
Is it just so that if SQL would fail, then the quorum & cluster would
still be up? If so, then is there really any pressing reason to seperate
|
them if my clustered server is ONLY used for SQL Server?
Quote:
Maybe it would be a little easier to recover?
Or is there a pressing performance or stability reason? |