![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Have you turned on the /PAE switch in BOOT.INI? Have you set the max SQL Server memory to about 7GB? Have you set the max degree of parallelism to 0? -- Tom ---------------------------------------------------------- ----- Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA SQL Server MVP Columnist, SQL Server Professional Toronto, ON Canada www.pinnaclepublishing.com/sql "Chad" <cwainscott (AT) marketingdirect (DOT) com> wrote in message news:101e201c3f252$fd9b9da0$a501280a (AT) phx (DOT) gbl... We have 2 IBM xSeries 360 servers with 4 processors and 8 GB of ram in each. These machines are setup in a clustered environment. Originally, these boxes had 2 procs in them and we added the additional processors 2 weeks ago. What we have noticed is that our execution plans are not using parallelism and querries are running slower than the time we had 2 procs. Does any one have any idea why our execution plans are not using parallelism and do you have any thoughts on how to correct? Thanks in advance! Chad |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Have you turned on the /PAE switch in BOOT.INI? Have you set the max SQL Server memory to about 7GB? Have you set the max degree of parallelism to 0? -- Tom ---------------------------------------------------------- ----- Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA SQL Server MVP Columnist, SQL Server Professional Toronto, ON Canada www.pinnaclepublishing.com/sql "Chad" <cwainscott (AT) marketingdirect (DOT) com> wrote in message news:101e201c3f252$fd9b9da0$a501280a (AT) phx (DOT) gbl... We have 2 IBM xSeries 360 servers with 4 processors and 8 GB of ram in each. These machines are setup in a clustered environment. Originally, these boxes had 2 procs in them and we added the additional processors 2 weeks ago. What we have noticed is that our execution plans are not using parallelism and querries are running slower than the time we had 2 procs. Does any one have any idea why our execution plans are not using parallelism and do you have any thoughts on how to correct? Thanks in advance! Chad |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Have you turned on the /PAE switch in BOOT.INI? Have you set the max SQL Server memory to about 7GB? Have you set the max degree of parallelism to 0? -- Tom ---------------------------------------------------------- ----- Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA SQL Server MVP Columnist, SQL Server Professional Toronto, ON Canada www.pinnaclepublishing.com/sql "Chad" <cwainscott (AT) marketingdirect (DOT) com> wrote in message news:101e201c3f252$fd9b9da0$a501280a (AT) phx (DOT) gbl... We have 2 IBM xSeries 360 servers with 4 processors and 8 GB of ram in each. These machines are setup in a clustered environment. Originally, these boxes had 2 procs in them and we added the additional processors 2 weeks ago. What we have noticed is that our execution plans are not using parallelism and querries are running slower than the time we had 2 procs. Does any one have any idea why our execution plans are not using parallelism and do you have any thoughts on how to correct? Thanks in advance! Chad |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |