dbTalk Databases Forums  

A/A or A/P

microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering


Discuss A/A or A/P in the microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Rob
 
Posts: n/a

Default A/A or A/P - 09-24-2004 , 08:45 AM






Hello:

I'm sort of new to clustering and some of these questions
popped into mind:

- From an administrative perspective, which of the two is
more easily manageable, Active/Active or Active/Passive?

- When would one want to use A/A or A/P (i.e. how to
evaluate key objectives to determine clustering type)

Thanks for your response.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: A/A or A/P - 09-24-2004 , 09:42 AM






Once you "get" clustering, A/A or A/P management is the same from a
clustering standpoint. From a SQL standpoint, A/A is more work, cause you
have another copy of SQL to manage.

It is not recommended to run A/A, most systems are not configured to handle
the double load upon failure.

Cheers,

Rod

MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog

"Rob" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote

Quote:
Hello:

I'm sort of new to clustering and some of these questions
popped into mind:

- From an administrative perspective, which of the two is
more easily manageable, Active/Active or Active/Passive?

- When would one want to use A/A or A/P (i.e. how to
evaluate key objectives to determine clustering type)

Thanks for your response.



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.