Once you "get" clustering, A/A or A/P management is the same from a
clustering standpoint. From a SQL standpoint, A/A is more work, cause you
have another copy of SQL to manage.
It is not recommended to run A/A, most systems are not configured to handle
the double load upon failure.
Cheers,
Rod
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
"Rob" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote
Quote:
Hello:
I'm sort of new to clustering and some of these questions
popped into mind:
- From an administrative perspective, which of the two is
more easily manageable, Active/Active or Active/Passive?
- When would one want to use A/A or A/P (i.e. how to
evaluate key objectives to determine clustering type)
Thanks for your response. |