![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Hello, I've been a Microsoft product user and developer for the longest time, but this time my boss has realized that the only way to scale Microsoft SQL is to throw lots of hardware at it. Also, he thinks SQL lacks horizontal scalability. On top of that, case studies like the one provided in this link just emphasize that SQL does not scale without using costly hardware.. http://www.microsoft.com/resources/c...es/casestudy.a s p?CaseStudyID=10802 So my question to you guys is how do you horizontally scale SQL while keeping redundancy? Finally, we are seriously considering OpenLDAP and a Linux distributed file system. We already hired the Linux hackers to do the job on not so costly hardware... ![]() ps: Linux is spreading.. . |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Hello, I've been a Microsoft product user and developer for the longest time, but this time my boss has realized that the only way to scale Microsoft SQL is to throw lots of hardware at it. Also, he thinks SQL lacks horizontal scalability. On top of that, case studies like the one provided in this link just emphasize that SQL does not scale without using costly hardware.. http://www.microsoft.com/resources/c...es/casestudy.a s p?CaseStudyID=10802 So my question to you guys is how do you horizontally scale SQL while keeping redundancy? Finally, we are seriously considering OpenLDAP and a Linux distributed file system. We already hired the Linux hackers to do the job on not so costly hardware... ![]() ps: Linux is spreading.. . |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Do you mean that you want to know if SQL Server have some Database Load Balancing features??? Like Oracle 9iRAC??? Cesar Kubo -----Original Message----- Hello, I've been a Microsoft product user and developer for the longest time, but this time my boss has realized that the only way to scale Microsoft SQL is to throw lots of hardware at it. Also, he thinks SQL lacks horizontal scalability. On top of that, case studies like the one provided in this link just emphasize that SQL does not scale without using costly hardware.. http://www.microsoft.com/resources/c...dies/casestudy. a s p?CaseStudyID=10802 So my question to you guys is how do you horizontally scale SQL while keeping redundancy? Finally, we are seriously considering OpenLDAP and a Linux distributed file system. We already hired the Linux hackers to do the job on not so costly hardware... ![]() ps: Linux is spreading.. . . |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Could you clarify what you mean by horizontal scalability? Linchi -----Original Message----- Hello, I've been a Microsoft product user and developer for the longest time, but this time my boss has realized that the only way to scale Microsoft SQL is to throw lots of hardware at it. Also, he thinks SQL lacks horizontal scalability. On top of that, case studies like the one provided in this link just emphasize that SQL does not scale without using costly hardware.. http://www.microsoft.com/resources/c...dies/casestudy. a s p?CaseStudyID=10802 So my question to you guys is how do you horizontally scale SQL while keeping redundancy? Finally, we are seriously considering OpenLDAP and a Linux distributed file system. We already hired the Linux hackers to do the job on not so costly hardware... ![]() ps: Linux is spreading.. . . |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- With MSSQL I have to keep adding hardware and more hardware to a single machine. THat's a single point of failure. That DOES NOT scale... Horizontal scalability allows me to just keep adding low cost servers to the farm hopefully sharing the same data. That flies.. Microsoft AFAIK does not offer horizontal scalability at all.. ![]() I like Microsoft, but I need a solution.. ps: Linux is spreading.. -----Original Message----- Could you clarify what you mean by horizontal scalability? Linchi -----Original Message----- Hello, I've been a Microsoft product user and developer for the longest time, but this time my boss has realized that the only way to scale Microsoft SQL is to throw lots of hardware at it. Also, he thinks SQL lacks horizontal scalability. On top of that, case studies like the one provided in this link just emphasize that SQL does not scale without using costly hardware.. http://www.microsoft.com/resources/c...dies/casestudy .. a s p?CaseStudyID=10802 So my question to you guys is how do you horizontally scale SQL while keeping redundancy? Finally, we are seriously considering OpenLDAP and a Linux distributed file system. We already hired the Linux hackers to do the job on not so costly hardware... ![]() ps: Linux is spreading.. . . . |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Besides load balancing , redundancy | clustering, how can SQL scale without having to add more CPUs to a single server? I will have to look into 9iRAC and compare.. -----Original Message----- Do you mean that you want to know if SQL Server have some Database Load Balancing features??? Like Oracle 9iRAC??? Cesar Kubo -----Original Message----- Hello, I've been a Microsoft product user and developer for the longest time, but this time my boss has realized that the only way to scale Microsoft SQL is to throw lots of hardware at it. Also, he thinks SQL lacks horizontal scalability. On top of that, case studies like the one provided in this link just emphasize that SQL does not scale without using costly hardware.. http://www.microsoft.com/resources/c...dies/casestudy .. a s p?CaseStudyID=10802 So my question to you guys is how do you horizontally scale SQL while keeping redundancy? Finally, we are seriously considering OpenLDAP and a Linux distributed file system. We already hired the Linux hackers to do the job on not so costly hardware... ![]() ps: Linux is spreading.. . . . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |