![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Hi there, I posted this in the windows clustering group as well, thought it was relevant to here as well though. I have a Windows 2000/Sql 2000 server cluster and while testing it discovered that if Node 1 is in control of the resources and the private and public network cables are pulled to initiate a failiure, the cluster cannot recover. Is this right? I would have expected that Node 2 would say I cant see Node 1 on either network and take the resources to provide the service? Should it act like this or do I have a problem with the cluster? Thanks In Advance, Andy . |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Hi there, I posted this in the windows clustering group as well, thought it was relevant to here as well though. I have a Windows 2000/Sql 2000 server cluster and while testing it discovered that if Node 1 is in control of the resources and the private and public network cables are pulled to initiate a failiure, the cluster cannot recover. Is this right? I would have expected that Node 2 would say I cant see Node 1 on either network and take the resources to provide the service? Should it act like this or do I have a problem with the cluster? Thanks In Advance, Andy . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |