![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. |
|
We have a 2 node 64-bit Windows 2003 Active/Active Cluster with 2 instances on each node. Each node has 2 virtual servers/named instances; 1 SQL 2000 (32-bit) and 1 SQL 2005 (64-bit). Thus the setup is as follows: SQLNode1: - SrvrA\sql01 - SrvrB\sql51 SQLNode2: - SrvrC\sql02 - SrvrD\sql52 Each node has 4 dual cores, 8GB RAM. The swap file is on a separate disk and is set to 8 GB. Each instance is configured/allocated 1845 MB "max server memory" with no minimum. The reason why only 1845 MB is allocated to each instance is because should all instances move/failover to the same node this would avoid that the SQL instances would compete for the memory. As you can see the total memory allocation for all instances is 7380 MB which leaves 812 MB for the operating system (in a failover state). Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. The SQL 2000's are working fine, no performance issues there. Both SQL 2005's instances are using approx 150MB RAM and paging the rest. Unfortunately no errors related to this were logged in the SQL Server error log or the Windows Event Log. We tried various options, including setting the "min server memory" and also confirmed that the service account had the policy "lock pages in memory" set. I found the following articles which explain similar issues with similar environments: 1. Discussion which appears to be related to 64-bit systems http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=100315 2. How to reduce paging of buffer pool memory in the 64-bit version of SQL Server 2005 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918483 3. How to determine the appropriate page file size for 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889654/ 4. SQL and the Working Set http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/arc...rking-set.aspx 5. A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...171fc3bcbd4e43 6. Does SQL Server always respond to memory pressure? http://blogs.msdn.com/slavao/archive...-pressure.aspx 7. The sizes of the working sets of all the processes in a console session may be trimmed when you use Terminal Services to log on to or log off from a computer that is running Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905865/en-us 8. Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition: System requirements http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true Most of the environments mentioned in the above links had (much more) RAM allocated on one SQL Server instance than the amount allocated in our setup. In a number of documents I came across the recommendation that besides the amount required for SQL Server, 2 GB are reserved for the operating system, antivirus is not installed on the database servers, and an amount of RAM be allocated for other services and applications. My gut feeling is that we should do a number of things. The first is to schedule a server reboot at least every month (to clear any possible memory leaks...?). The second is that more RAM is added to the nodes. We could also modify the size of the pagefile to 1.5 times the allocated RAM. What is true is that the pagefile utilisation is very high and we might encounter bottlenecks (due to disk IO) should the activity increase. I would appreciate any comments from your end. Thanks and regards, Reuben |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. |
|
We have a 2 node 64-bit Windows 2003 Active/Active Cluster with 2 instances on each node. Each node has 2 virtual servers/named instances; 1 SQL 2000 (32-bit) and 1 SQL 2005 (64-bit). Thus the setup is as follows: SQLNode1: - SrvrA\sql01 - SrvrB\sql51 SQLNode2: - SrvrC\sql02 - SrvrD\sql52 Each node has 4 dual cores, 8GB RAM. The swap file is on a separate disk and is set to 8 GB. Each instance is configured/allocated 1845 MB "max server memory" with no minimum. The reason why only 1845 MB is allocated to each instance is because should all instances move/failover to the same node this would avoid that the SQL instances would compete for the memory. As you can see the total memory allocation for all instances is 7380 MB which leaves 812 MB for the operating system (in a failover state). Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. The SQL 2000's are working fine, no performance issues there. Both SQL 2005's instances are using approx 150MB RAM and paging the rest. Unfortunately no errors related to this were logged in the SQL Server error log or the Windows Event Log. We tried various options, including setting the "min server memory" and also confirmed that the service account had the policy "lock pages in memory" set. I found the following articles which explain similar issues with similar environments: 1. Discussion which appears to be related to 64-bit systems http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=100315 2. How to reduce paging of buffer pool memory in the 64-bit version of SQL Server 2005 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918483 3. How to determine the appropriate page file size for 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889654/ 4. SQL and the Working Set http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/arc...rking-set.aspx 5. A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...171fc3bcbd4e43 6. Does SQL Server always respond to memory pressure? http://blogs.msdn.com/slavao/archive...-pressure.aspx 7. The sizes of the working sets of all the processes in a console session may be trimmed when you use Terminal Services to log on to or log off from a computer that is running Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905865/en-us 8. Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition: System requirements http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true Most of the environments mentioned in the above links had (much more) RAM allocated on one SQL Server instance than the amount allocated in our setup. In a number of documents I came across the recommendation that besides the amount required for SQL Server, 2 GB are reserved for the operating system, antivirus is not installed on the database servers, and an amount of RAM be allocated for other services and applications. My gut feeling is that we should do a number of things. The first is to schedule a server reboot at least every month (to clear any possible memory leaks...?). The second is that more RAM is added to the nodes. We could also modify the size of the pagefile to 1.5 times the allocated RAM. What is true is that the pagefile utilisation is very high and we might encounter bottlenecks (due to disk IO) should the activity increase. I would appreciate any comments from your end. Thanks and regards, Reuben |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. |
|
We have a 2 node 64-bit Windows 2003 Active/Active Cluster with 2 instances on each node. Each node has 2 virtual servers/named instances; 1 SQL 2000 (32-bit) and 1 SQL 2005 (64-bit). Thus the setup is as follows: SQLNode1: - SrvrA\sql01 - SrvrB\sql51 SQLNode2: - SrvrC\sql02 - SrvrD\sql52 Each node has 4 dual cores, 8GB RAM. The swap file is on a separate disk and is set to 8 GB. Each instance is configured/allocated 1845 MB "max server memory" with no minimum. The reason why only 1845 MB is allocated to each instance is because should all instances move/failover to the same node this would avoid that the SQL instances would compete for the memory. As you can see the total memory allocation for all instances is 7380 MB which leaves 812 MB for the operating system (in a failover state). Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. The SQL 2000's are working fine, no performance issues there. Both SQL 2005's instances are using approx 150MB RAM and paging the rest. Unfortunately no errors related to this were logged in the SQL Server error log or the Windows Event Log. We tried various options, including setting the "min server memory" and also confirmed that the service account had the policy "lock pages in memory" set. I found the following articles which explain similar issues with similar environments: 1. Discussion which appears to be related to 64-bit systems http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=100315 2. How to reduce paging of buffer pool memory in the 64-bit version of SQL Server 2005 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918483 3. How to determine the appropriate page file size for 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889654/ 4. SQL and the Working Set http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/arc...rking-set.aspx 5. A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...171fc3bcbd4e43 6. Does SQL Server always respond to memory pressure? http://blogs.msdn.com/slavao/archive...-pressure.aspx 7. The sizes of the working sets of all the processes in a console session may be trimmed when you use Terminal Services to log on to or log off from a computer that is running Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905865/en-us 8. Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition: System requirements http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true Most of the environments mentioned in the above links had (much more) RAM allocated on one SQL Server instance than the amount allocated in our setup. In a number of documents I came across the recommendation that besides the amount required for SQL Server, 2 GB are reserved for the operating system, antivirus is not installed on the database servers, and an amount of RAM be allocated for other services and applications. My gut feeling is that we should do a number of things. The first is to schedule a server reboot at least every month (to clear any possible memory leaks...?). The second is that more RAM is added to the nodes. We could also modify the size of the pagefile to 1.5 times the allocated RAM. What is true is that the pagefile utilisation is very high and we might encounter bottlenecks (due to disk IO) should the activity increase. I would appreciate any comments from your end. Thanks and regards, Reuben |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. |
|
We have a 2 node 64-bit Windows 2003 Active/Active Cluster with 2 instances on each node. Each node has 2 virtual servers/named instances; 1 SQL 2000 (32-bit) and 1 SQL 2005 (64-bit). Thus the setup is as follows: SQLNode1: - SrvrA\sql01 - SrvrB\sql51 SQLNode2: - SrvrC\sql02 - SrvrD\sql52 Each node has 4 dual cores, 8GB RAM. The swap file is on a separate disk and is set to 8 GB. Each instance is configured/allocated 1845 MB "max server memory" with no minimum. The reason why only 1845 MB is allocated to each instance is because should all instances move/failover to the same node this would avoid that the SQL instances would compete for the memory. As you can see the total memory allocation for all instances is 7380 MB which leaves 812 MB for the operating system (in a failover state). Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. The SQL 2000's are working fine, no performance issues there. Both SQL 2005's instances are using approx 150MB RAM and paging the rest. Unfortunately no errors related to this were logged in the SQL Server error log or the Windows Event Log. We tried various options, including setting the "min server memory" and also confirmed that the service account had the policy "lock pages in memory" set. I found the following articles which explain similar issues with similar environments: 1. Discussion which appears to be related to 64-bit systems http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=100315 2. How to reduce paging of buffer pool memory in the 64-bit version of SQL Server 2005 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918483 3. How to determine the appropriate page file size for 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889654/ 4. SQL and the Working Set http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/arc...rking-set.aspx 5. A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...171fc3bcbd4e43 6. Does SQL Server always respond to memory pressure? http://blogs.msdn.com/slavao/archive...-pressure.aspx 7. The sizes of the working sets of all the processes in a console session may be trimmed when you use Terminal Services to log on to or log off from a computer that is running Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905865/en-us 8. Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition: System requirements http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true Most of the environments mentioned in the above links had (much more) RAM allocated on one SQL Server instance than the amount allocated in our setup. In a number of documents I came across the recommendation that besides the amount required for SQL Server, 2 GB are reserved for the operating system, antivirus is not installed on the database servers, and an amount of RAM be allocated for other services and applications. My gut feeling is that we should do a number of things. The first is to schedule a server reboot at least every month (to clear any possible memory leaks...?). The second is that more RAM is added to the nodes. We could also modify the size of the pagefile to 1.5 times the allocated RAM. What is true is that the pagefile utilisation is very high and we might encounter bottlenecks (due to disk IO) should the activity increase. I would appreciate any comments from your end. Thanks and regards, Reuben |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. |
|
We have a 2 node 64-bit Windows 2003 Active/Active Cluster with 2 instances on each node. Each node has 2 virtual servers/named instances; 1 SQL 2000 (32-bit) and 1 SQL 2005 (64-bit). Thus the setup is as follows: SQLNode1: - SrvrA\sql01 - SrvrB\sql51 SQLNode2: - SrvrC\sql02 - SrvrD\sql52 Each node has 4 dual cores, 8GB RAM. The swap file is on a separate disk and is set to 8 GB. Each instance is configured/allocated 1845 MB "max server memory" with no minimum. The reason why only 1845 MB is allocated to each instance is because should all instances move/failover to the same node this would avoid that the SQL instances would compete for the memory. As you can see the total memory allocation for all instances is 7380 MB which leaves 812 MB for the operating system (in a failover state). Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. The SQL 2000's are working fine, no performance issues there. Both SQL 2005's instances are using approx 150MB RAM and paging the rest. Unfortunately no errors related to this were logged in the SQL Server error log or the Windows Event Log. We tried various options, including setting the "min server memory" and also confirmed that the service account had the policy "lock pages in memory" set. I found the following articles which explain similar issues with similar environments: 1. Discussion which appears to be related to 64-bit systems http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=100315 2. How to reduce paging of buffer pool memory in the 64-bit version of SQL Server 2005 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918483 3. How to determine the appropriate page file size for 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889654/ 4. SQL and the Working Set http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/arc...rking-set.aspx 5. A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...171fc3bcbd4e43 6. Does SQL Server always respond to memory pressure? http://blogs.msdn.com/slavao/archive...-pressure.aspx 7. The sizes of the working sets of all the processes in a console session may be trimmed when you use Terminal Services to log on to or log off from a computer that is running Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905865/en-us 8. Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition: System requirements http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true Most of the environments mentioned in the above links had (much more) RAM allocated on one SQL Server instance than the amount allocated in our setup. In a number of documents I came across the recommendation that besides the amount required for SQL Server, 2 GB are reserved for the operating system, antivirus is not installed on the database servers, and an amount of RAM be allocated for other services and applications. My gut feeling is that we should do a number of things. The first is to schedule a server reboot at least every month (to clear any possible memory leaks...?). The second is that more RAM is added to the nodes. We could also modify the size of the pagefile to 1.5 times the allocated RAM. What is true is that the pagefile utilisation is very high and we might encounter bottlenecks (due to disk IO) should the activity increase. I would appreciate any comments from your end. Thanks and regards, Reuben |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. |
|
We have a 2 node 64-bit Windows 2003 Active/Active Cluster with 2 instances on each node. Each node has 2 virtual servers/named instances; 1 SQL 2000 (32-bit) and 1 SQL 2005 (64-bit). Thus the setup is as follows: SQLNode1: - SrvrA\sql01 - SrvrB\sql51 SQLNode2: - SrvrC\sql02 - SrvrD\sql52 Each node has 4 dual cores, 8GB RAM. The swap file is on a separate disk and is set to 8 GB. Each instance is configured/allocated 1845 MB "max server memory" with no minimum. The reason why only 1845 MB is allocated to each instance is because should all instances move/failover to the same node this would avoid that the SQL instances would compete for the memory. As you can see the total memory allocation for all instances is 7380 MB which leaves 812 MB for the operating system (in a failover state). Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. The SQL 2000's are working fine, no performance issues there. Both SQL 2005's instances are using approx 150MB RAM and paging the rest. Unfortunately no errors related to this were logged in the SQL Server error log or the Windows Event Log. We tried various options, including setting the "min server memory" and also confirmed that the service account had the policy "lock pages in memory" set. I found the following articles which explain similar issues with similar environments: 1. Discussion which appears to be related to 64-bit systems http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=100315 2. How to reduce paging of buffer pool memory in the 64-bit version of SQL Server 2005 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918483 3. How to determine the appropriate page file size for 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889654/ 4. SQL and the Working Set http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/arc...rking-set.aspx 5. A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...171fc3bcbd4e43 6. Does SQL Server always respond to memory pressure? http://blogs.msdn.com/slavao/archive...-pressure.aspx 7. The sizes of the working sets of all the processes in a console session may be trimmed when you use Terminal Services to log on to or log off from a computer that is running Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905865/en-us 8. Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition: System requirements http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true Most of the environments mentioned in the above links had (much more) RAM allocated on one SQL Server instance than the amount allocated in our setup. In a number of documents I came across the recommendation that besides the amount required for SQL Server, 2 GB are reserved for the operating system, antivirus is not installed on the database servers, and an amount of RAM be allocated for other services and applications. My gut feeling is that we should do a number of things. The first is to schedule a server reboot at least every month (to clear any possible memory leaks...?). The second is that more RAM is added to the nodes. We could also modify the size of the pagefile to 1.5 times the allocated RAM. What is true is that the pagefile utilisation is very high and we might encounter bottlenecks (due to disk IO) should the activity increase. I would appreciate any comments from your end. Thanks and regards, Reuben |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. |
|
We have a 2 node 64-bit Windows 2003 Active/Active Cluster with 2 instances on each node. Each node has 2 virtual servers/named instances; 1 SQL 2000 (32-bit) and 1 SQL 2005 (64-bit). Thus the setup is as follows: SQLNode1: - SrvrA\sql01 - SrvrB\sql51 SQLNode2: - SrvrC\sql02 - SrvrD\sql52 Each node has 4 dual cores, 8GB RAM. The swap file is on a separate disk and is set to 8 GB. Each instance is configured/allocated 1845 MB "max server memory" with no minimum. The reason why only 1845 MB is allocated to each instance is because should all instances move/failover to the same node this would avoid that the SQL instances would compete for the memory. As you can see the total memory allocation for all instances is 7380 MB which leaves 812 MB for the operating system (in a failover state). Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. The SQL 2000's are working fine, no performance issues there. Both SQL 2005's instances are using approx 150MB RAM and paging the rest. Unfortunately no errors related to this were logged in the SQL Server error log or the Windows Event Log. We tried various options, including setting the "min server memory" and also confirmed that the service account had the policy "lock pages in memory" set. I found the following articles which explain similar issues with similar environments: 1. Discussion which appears to be related to 64-bit systems http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=100315 2. How to reduce paging of buffer pool memory in the 64-bit version of SQL Server 2005 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918483 3. How to determine the appropriate page file size for 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889654/ 4. SQL and the Working Set http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/arc...rking-set.aspx 5. A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...171fc3bcbd4e43 6. Does SQL Server always respond to memory pressure? http://blogs.msdn.com/slavao/archive...-pressure.aspx 7. The sizes of the working sets of all the processes in a console session may be trimmed when you use Terminal Services to log on to or log off from a computer that is running Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905865/en-us 8. Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition: System requirements http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true Most of the environments mentioned in the above links had (much more) RAM allocated on one SQL Server instance than the amount allocated in our setup. In a number of documents I came across the recommendation that besides the amount required for SQL Server, 2 GB are reserved for the operating system, antivirus is not installed on the database servers, and an amount of RAM be allocated for other services and applications. My gut feeling is that we should do a number of things. The first is to schedule a server reboot at least every month (to clear any possible memory leaks...?). The second is that more RAM is added to the nodes. We could also modify the size of the pagefile to 1.5 times the allocated RAM. What is true is that the pagefile utilisation is very high and we might encounter bottlenecks (due to disk IO) should the activity increase. I would appreciate any comments from your end. Thanks and regards, Reuben |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. |
|
We have a 2 node 64-bit Windows 2003 Active/Active Cluster with 2 instances on each node. Each node has 2 virtual servers/named instances; 1 SQL 2000 (32-bit) and 1 SQL 2005 (64-bit). Thus the setup is as follows: SQLNode1: - SrvrA\sql01 - SrvrB\sql51 SQLNode2: - SrvrC\sql02 - SrvrD\sql52 Each node has 4 dual cores, 8GB RAM. The swap file is on a separate disk and is set to 8 GB. Each instance is configured/allocated 1845 MB "max server memory" with no minimum. The reason why only 1845 MB is allocated to each instance is because should all instances move/failover to the same node this would avoid that the SQL instances would compete for the memory. As you can see the total memory allocation for all instances is 7380 MB which leaves 812 MB for the operating system (in a failover state). Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. The SQL 2000's are working fine, no performance issues there. Both SQL 2005's instances are using approx 150MB RAM and paging the rest. Unfortunately no errors related to this were logged in the SQL Server error log or the Windows Event Log. We tried various options, including setting the "min server memory" and also confirmed that the service account had the policy "lock pages in memory" set. I found the following articles which explain similar issues with similar environments: 1. Discussion which appears to be related to 64-bit systems http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=100315 2. How to reduce paging of buffer pool memory in the 64-bit version of SQL Server 2005 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918483 3. How to determine the appropriate page file size for 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889654/ 4. SQL and the Working Set http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/arc...rking-set.aspx 5. A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...171fc3bcbd4e43 6. Does SQL Server always respond to memory pressure? http://blogs.msdn.com/slavao/archive...-pressure.aspx 7. The sizes of the working sets of all the processes in a console session may be trimmed when you use Terminal Services to log on to or log off from a computer that is running Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905865/en-us 8. Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition: System requirements http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true Most of the environments mentioned in the above links had (much more) RAM allocated on one SQL Server instance than the amount allocated in our setup. In a number of documents I came across the recommendation that besides the amount required for SQL Server, 2 GB are reserved for the operating system, antivirus is not installed on the database servers, and an amount of RAM be allocated for other services and applications. My gut feeling is that we should do a number of things. The first is to schedule a server reboot at least every month (to clear any possible memory leaks...?). The second is that more RAM is added to the nodes. We could also modify the size of the pagefile to 1.5 times the allocated RAM. What is true is that the pagefile utilisation is very high and we might encounter bottlenecks (due to disk IO) should the activity increase. I would appreciate any comments from your end. Thanks and regards, Reuben |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. |
|
We have a 2 node 64-bit Windows 2003 Active/Active Cluster with 2 instances on each node. Each node has 2 virtual servers/named instances; 1 SQL 2000 (32-bit) and 1 SQL 2005 (64-bit). Thus the setup is as follows: SQLNode1: - SrvrA\sql01 - SrvrB\sql51 SQLNode2: - SrvrC\sql02 - SrvrD\sql52 Each node has 4 dual cores, 8GB RAM. The swap file is on a separate disk and is set to 8 GB. Each instance is configured/allocated 1845 MB "max server memory" with no minimum. The reason why only 1845 MB is allocated to each instance is because should all instances move/failover to the same node this would avoid that the SQL instances would compete for the memory. As you can see the total memory allocation for all instances is 7380 MB which leaves 812 MB for the operating system (in a failover state). Basically what is happening is that the sqlsrvr.exe (2005) is using approximately 150MB memory and paging the rest. The SQL 2000's are working fine, no performance issues there. Both SQL 2005's instances are using approx 150MB RAM and paging the rest. Unfortunately no errors related to this were logged in the SQL Server error log or the Windows Event Log. We tried various options, including setting the "min server memory" and also confirmed that the service account had the policy "lock pages in memory" set. I found the following articles which explain similar issues with similar environments: 1. Discussion which appears to be related to 64-bit systems http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=100315 2. How to reduce paging of buffer pool memory in the 64-bit version of SQL Server 2005 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918483 3. How to determine the appropriate page file size for 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889654/ 4. SQL and the Working Set http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/arc...rking-set.aspx 5. A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...171fc3bcbd4e43 6. Does SQL Server always respond to memory pressure? http://blogs.msdn.com/slavao/archive...-pressure.aspx 7. The sizes of the working sets of all the processes in a console session may be trimmed when you use Terminal Services to log on to or log off from a computer that is running Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905865/en-us 8. Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition: System requirements http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true Most of the environments mentioned in the above links had (much more) RAM allocated on one SQL Server instance than the amount allocated in our setup. In a number of documents I came across the recommendation that besides the amount required for SQL Server, 2 GB are reserved for the operating system, antivirus is not installed on the database servers, and an amount of RAM be allocated for other services and applications. My gut feeling is that we should do a number of things. The first is to schedule a server reboot at least every month (to clear any possible memory leaks...?). The second is that more RAM is added to the nodes. We could also modify the size of the pagefile to 1.5 times the allocated RAM. What is true is that the pagefile utilisation is very high and we might encounter bottlenecks (due to disk IO) should the activity increase. I would appreciate any comments from your end. Thanks and regards, Reuben |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |