![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, On the installation screen we have two options 1. New SQL SERVER failover cluster installation. Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster. 2. Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster. Launch a wizard to add a node to an existing SQL SERVER failover cluster. However, if we choose "Advanced" from the SQL SERVER 2008 Installation screen we get two new options for clustering 1. Advanced Cluster Preparation Launch a wizard to prepare a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster installation. 2. Advanced Cluster Completion. Launch a wizard to complete a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster from a list of cluster-prepared SQL SERVER 2008 instances.. my question is which is the best way to go? The option I chose was on the first node "Advanced Cluster Preparation" and then "Advanced Cluster Completion" and then on the second node "Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster" all seems ok, however could I have made a better choice? also, the option that lets me "Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster." leads me to the additional question is it possible / sensible to have a single-node sql server 2008 installation, or is this just a starting point for something bigger? many thanks in advance for your answers / comments. cheers martin. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, On the installation screen we have two options 1. New SQL SERVER failover cluster installation. Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster. 2. Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster. Launch a wizard to add a node to an existing SQL SERVER failover cluster. However, if we choose "Advanced" from the SQL SERVER 2008 Installation screen we get two new options for clustering 1. Advanced Cluster Preparation Launch a wizard to prepare a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster installation. 2. Advanced Cluster Completion. Launch a wizard to complete a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster from a list of cluster-prepared SQL SERVER 2008 instances.. my question is which is the best way to go? The option I chose was on the first node "Advanced Cluster Preparation" and then "Advanced Cluster Completion" and then on the second node "Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster" all seems ok, however could I have made a better choice? also, the option that lets me "Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster." leads me to the additional question is it possible / sensible to have a single-node sql server 2008 installation, or is this just a starting point for something bigger? many thanks in advance for your answers / comments. cheers martin. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, On the installation screen we have two options 1. New SQL SERVER failover cluster installation. Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster. 2. Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster. Launch a wizard to add a node to an existing SQL SERVER failover cluster. However, if we choose "Advanced" from the SQL SERVER 2008 Installation screen we get two new options for clustering 1. Advanced Cluster Preparation Launch a wizard to prepare a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster installation. 2. Advanced Cluster Completion. Launch a wizard to complete a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster from a list of cluster-prepared SQL SERVER 2008 instances.. my question is which is the best way to go? The option I chose was on the first node "Advanced Cluster Preparation" and then "Advanced Cluster Completion" and then on the second node "Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster" all seems ok, however could I have made a better choice? also, the option that lets me "Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster." leads me to the additional question is it possible / sensible to have a single-node sql server 2008 installation, or is this just a starting point for something bigger? many thanks in advance for your answers / comments. cheers martin. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, On the installation screen we have two options 1. New SQL SERVER failover cluster installation. Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster. 2. Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster. Launch a wizard to add a node to an existing SQL SERVER failover cluster. However, if we choose "Advanced" from the SQL SERVER 2008 Installation screen we get two new options for clustering 1. Advanced Cluster Preparation Launch a wizard to prepare a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster installation. 2. Advanced Cluster Completion. Launch a wizard to complete a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster from a list of cluster-prepared SQL SERVER 2008 instances.. my question is which is the best way to go? The option I chose was on the first node "Advanced Cluster Preparation" and then "Advanced Cluster Completion" and then on the second node "Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster" all seems ok, however could I have made a better choice? also, the option that lets me "Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster." leads me to the additional question is it possible / sensible to have a single-node sql server 2008 installation, or is this just a starting point for something bigger? many thanks in advance for your answers / comments. cheers martin. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, On the installation screen we have two options 1. New SQL SERVER failover cluster installation. Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster. 2. Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster. Launch a wizard to add a node to an existing SQL SERVER failover cluster. However, if we choose "Advanced" from the SQL SERVER 2008 Installation screen we get two new options for clustering 1. Advanced Cluster Preparation Launch a wizard to prepare a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster installation. 2. Advanced Cluster Completion. Launch a wizard to complete a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster from a list of cluster-prepared SQL SERVER 2008 instances.. my question is which is the best way to go? The option I chose was on the first node "Advanced Cluster Preparation" and then "Advanced Cluster Completion" and then on the second node "Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster" all seems ok, however could I have made a better choice? also, the option that lets me "Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster." leads me to the additional question is it possible / sensible to have a single-node sql server 2008 installation, or is this just a starting point for something bigger? many thanks in advance for your answers / comments. cheers martin. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, On the installation screen we have two options 1. New SQL SERVER failover cluster installation. Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster. 2. Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster. Launch a wizard to add a node to an existing SQL SERVER failover cluster. However, if we choose "Advanced" from the SQL SERVER 2008 Installation screen we get two new options for clustering 1. Advanced Cluster Preparation Launch a wizard to prepare a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster installation. 2. Advanced Cluster Completion. Launch a wizard to complete a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster from a list of cluster-prepared SQL SERVER 2008 instances.. my question is which is the best way to go? The option I chose was on the first node "Advanced Cluster Preparation" and then "Advanced Cluster Completion" and then on the second node "Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster" all seems ok, however could I have made a better choice? also, the option that lets me "Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster." leads me to the additional question is it possible / sensible to have a single-node sql server 2008 installation, or is this just a starting point for something bigger? many thanks in advance for your answers / comments. cheers martin. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, On the installation screen we have two options 1. New SQL SERVER failover cluster installation. Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster. 2. Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster. Launch a wizard to add a node to an existing SQL SERVER failover cluster. However, if we choose "Advanced" from the SQL SERVER 2008 Installation screen we get two new options for clustering 1. Advanced Cluster Preparation Launch a wizard to prepare a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster installation. 2. Advanced Cluster Completion. Launch a wizard to complete a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster from a list of cluster-prepared SQL SERVER 2008 instances.. my question is which is the best way to go? The option I chose was on the first node "Advanced Cluster Preparation" and then "Advanced Cluster Completion" and then on the second node "Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster" all seems ok, however could I have made a better choice? also, the option that lets me "Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster." leads me to the additional question is it possible / sensible to have a single-node sql server 2008 installation, or is this just a starting point for something bigger? many thanks in advance for your answers / comments. cheers martin. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, On the installation screen we have two options 1. New SQL SERVER failover cluster installation. Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster. 2. Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster. Launch a wizard to add a node to an existing SQL SERVER failover cluster. However, if we choose "Advanced" from the SQL SERVER 2008 Installation screen we get two new options for clustering 1. Advanced Cluster Preparation Launch a wizard to prepare a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster installation. 2. Advanced Cluster Completion. Launch a wizard to complete a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster from a list of cluster-prepared SQL SERVER 2008 instances.. my question is which is the best way to go? The option I chose was on the first node "Advanced Cluster Preparation" and then "Advanced Cluster Completion" and then on the second node "Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster" all seems ok, however could I have made a better choice? also, the option that lets me "Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster." leads me to the additional question is it possible / sensible to have a single-node sql server 2008 installation, or is this just a starting point for something bigger? many thanks in advance for your answers / comments. cheers martin. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, On the installation screen we have two options 1. New SQL SERVER failover cluster installation. Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster. 2. Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster. Launch a wizard to add a node to an existing SQL SERVER failover cluster. However, if we choose "Advanced" from the SQL SERVER 2008 Installation screen we get two new options for clustering 1. Advanced Cluster Preparation Launch a wizard to prepare a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster installation. 2. Advanced Cluster Completion. Launch a wizard to complete a SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster from a list of cluster-prepared SQL SERVER 2008 instances.. my question is which is the best way to go? The option I chose was on the first node "Advanced Cluster Preparation" and then "Advanced Cluster Completion" and then on the second node "Add node to a SQL SERVER failover cluster" all seems ok, however could I have made a better choice? also, the option that lets me "Launch a wizard to install a single-node SQL SERVER 2008 failover cluster." leads me to the additional question is it possible / sensible to have a single-node sql server 2008 installation, or is this just a starting point for something bigger? many thanks in advance for your answers / comments. cheers martin. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |