![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am testing an active/passive cluster running W2003 and SQL 2005 SP2. What I try to test is: Power down one node and then on the active node using Add/Remove program to attempt to take that node out. According to what I read from the Web and a book, this is a required step regardless the accessibility of the node. When I am doing that, the System Configuration Check reports 9 errors and 7 warnings. That is what I expected since the node is not available. When I select "Maintain the Virtual Server", the node is shown in the Unavailable nodes list. However, on the Ready to Update page, the "install" button is dimmed out. It seems to be no way to take the node out of the cluster. Is there another way? What is the right way? I think what I am testing should be a realistic scenario. Thanks a lot for your help. Daniel Dong |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am testing an active/passive cluster running W2003 and SQL 2005 SP2. What I try to test is: Power down one node and then on the active node using Add/Remove program to attempt to take that node out. According to what I read from the Web and a book, this is a required step regardless the accessibility of the node. When I am doing that, the System Configuration Check reports 9 errors and 7 warnings. That is what I expected since the node is not available. When I select "Maintain the Virtual Server", the node is shown in the Unavailable nodes list. However, on the Ready to Update page, the "install" button is dimmed out. It seems to be no way to take the node out of the cluster. Is there another way? What is the right way? I think what I am testing should be a realistic scenario. Thanks a lot for your help. Daniel Dong |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am testing an active/passive cluster running W2003 and SQL 2005 SP2. What I try to test is: Power down one node and then on the active node using Add/Remove program to attempt to take that node out. According to what I read from the Web and a book, this is a required step regardless the accessibility of the node. When I am doing that, the System Configuration Check reports 9 errors and 7 warnings. That is what I expected since the node is not available. When I select "Maintain the Virtual Server", the node is shown in the Unavailable nodes list. However, on the Ready to Update page, the "install" button is dimmed out. It seems to be no way to take the node out of the cluster. Is there another way? What is the right way? I think what I am testing should be a realistic scenario. Thanks a lot for your help. Daniel Dong |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
What you want to do is remove it from the available nodes list. SQL will try and remove the code, but will fail that step. Then it will proceed to alter its internal configuration and eliminate that node. Note that this is a separate step from evicting the node in the cluster tool. -- Geoff N. Hiten Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant Microsoft SQL Server MVP "danieldong" <danieldong (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:618F2420-BD5B-41B6-B21B-0701F098F45A (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... I am testing an active/passive cluster running W2003 and SQL 2005 SP2. What I try to test is: Power down one node and then on the active node using Add/Remove program to attempt to take that node out. According to what I read from the Web and a book, this is a required step regardless the accessibility of the node. When I am doing that, the System Configuration Check reports 9 errors and 7 warnings. That is what I expected since the node is not available. When I select "Maintain the Virtual Server", the node is shown in the Unavailable nodes list. However, on the Ready to Update page, the "install" button is dimmed out. It seems to be no way to take the node out of the cluster. Is there another way? What is the right way? I think what I am testing should be a realistic scenario. Thanks a lot for your help. Daniel Dong |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Rodney, App "danieldong" wrote: I am testing an active/passive cluster running W2003 and SQL 2005 SP2. What I try to test is: Power down one node and then on the active node using Add/Remove program to attempt to take that node out. According to what I read from the Web and a book, this is a required step regardless the accessibility of the node. When I am doing that, the System Configuration Check reports 9 errors and 7 warnings. That is what I expected since the node is not available. When I select "Maintain the Virtual Server", the node is shown in the Unavailable nodes list. However, on the Ready to Update page, the "install" button is dimmed out. It seems to be no way to take the node out of the cluster. Is there another way? What is the right way? I think what I am testing should be a realistic scenario. Thanks a lot for your help. Daniel Dong |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Rodney, Appreciate your quick confirmation. So once the node is actually unavailable, it is not required to take the node out of the sql cluster chain (there is no way to do that to me) and it is safe to evict it from the Window cluster (No corruption will occur, right? How can that happen anyway?). The book I have and the Web says that removing the node is required even though the failed node is not accessible. I think if those two nodes are in the cluster and talking each other, evicting the node could cause corruption. Have you evicted a failed node before doing anything else? I am going to do some testing and will let you all know. Looking forward to hearing from you. Appreciate your help. "danieldong" wrote: Rodney, App "danieldong" wrote: I am testing an active/passive cluster running W2003 and SQL 2005 SP2. What I try to test is: Power down one node and then on the active node using Add/Remove program to attempt to take that node out. According to what I read from the Web and a book, this is a required step regardless the accessibility of the node. When I am doing that, the System Configuration Check reports 9 errors and 7 warnings. That is what I expected since the node is not available. When I select "Maintain the Virtual Server", the node is shown in the Unavailable nodes list. However, on the Ready to Update page, the "install" button is dimmed out. It seems to be no way to take the node out of the cluster. Is there another way? What is the right way? I think what I am testing should be a realistic scenario. Thanks a lot for your help. Daniel Dong |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Rodney/Geoff, Yes. U are right. I am able to evict the failed node (with power down or Cluster Service down). There is no curruption. I am going to try to evict a node when those two nodes still can see each other to see if the corruption will happen. Thanks again "danieldong" wrote: Rodney, Appreciate your quick confirmation. So once the node is actually unavailable, it is not required to take the node out of the sql cluster chain (there is no way to do that to me) and it is safe to evict it from the Window cluster (No corruption will occur, right? How can that happen anyway?). The book I have and the Web says that removing the node is required even though the failed node is not accessible. I think if those two nodes are in the cluster and talking each other, evicting the node could cause corruption. Have you evicted a failed node before doing anything else? I am going to do some testing and will let you all know. Looking forward to hearing from you. Appreciate your help. "danieldong" wrote: Rodney, App "danieldong" wrote: I am testing an active/passive cluster running W2003 and SQL 2005 SP2. What I try to test is: Power down one node and then on the active node using Add/Remove program to attempt to take that node out. According to what I read from the Web and a book, this is a required step regardless the accessibility of the node. When I am doing that, the System Configuration Check reports 9 errors and 7 warnings. That is what I expected since the node is not available. When I select "Maintain the Virtual Server", the node is shown in the Unavailable nodes list. However, on the Ready to Update page, the "install" button is dimmed out. It seems to be no way to take the node out of the cluster. Is there another way? What is the right way? I think what I am testing should be a realistic scenario. Thanks a lot for your help. Daniel Dong |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
You will have to stop the cluster service before you can evict the node, so no corruption will occur. But please, test away! Cheers, Rodney R. Fournier MVP - Windows Server - Clustering http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner "danieldong" <danieldong (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:121F181D-4385-4DC3-987E-4697D8FDFEC6 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Rodney/Geoff, Yes. U are right. I am able to evict the failed node (with power down or Cluster Service down). There is no curruption. I am going to try to evict a node when those two nodes still can see each other to see if the corruption will happen. Thanks again "danieldong" wrote: Rodney, Appreciate your quick confirmation. So once the node is actually unavailable, it is not required to take the node out of the sql cluster chain (there is no way to do that to me) and it is safe to evict it from the Window cluster (No corruption will occur, right? How can that happen anyway?). The book I have and the Web says that removing the node is required even though the failed node is not accessible. I think if those two nodes are in the cluster and talking each other, evicting the node could cause corruption. Have you evicted a failed node before doing anything else? I am going to do some testing and will let you all know. Looking forward to hearing from you. Appreciate your help. "danieldong" wrote: Rodney, App "danieldong" wrote: I am testing an active/passive cluster running W2003 and SQL 2005 SP2. What I try to test is: Power down one node and then on the active node using Add/Remove program to attempt to take that node out. According to what I read from the Web and a book, this is a required step regardless the accessibility of the node. When I am doing that, the System Configuration Check reports 9 errors and 7 warnings. That is what I expected since the node is not available. When I select "Maintain the Virtual Server", the node is shown in the Unavailable nodes list. However, on the Ready to Update page, the "install" button is dimmed out. It seems to be no way to take the node out of the cluster. Is there another way? What is the right way? I think what I am testing should be a realistic scenario. Thanks a lot for your help. Daniel Dong |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Rodney, I did test many times with different scenarios. I do not have any corruptions. By the way, I am using 4 node cluster. Thanks again. Daniel "Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" wrote: You will have to stop the cluster service before you can evict the node, so no corruption will occur. But please, test away! Cheers, Rodney R. Fournier MVP - Windows Server - Clustering http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner "danieldong" <danieldong (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:121F181D-4385-4DC3-987E-4697D8FDFEC6 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Rodney/Geoff, Yes. U are right. I am able to evict the failed node (with power down or Cluster Service down). There is no curruption. I am going to try to evict a node when those two nodes still can see each other to see if the corruption will happen. Thanks again "danieldong" wrote: Rodney, Appreciate your quick confirmation. So once the node is actually unavailable, it is not required to take the node out of the sql cluster chain (there is no way to do that to me) and it is safe to evict it from the Window cluster (No corruption will occur, right? How can that happen anyway?). The book I have and the Web says that removing the node is required even though the failed node is not accessible. I think if those two nodes are in the cluster and talking each other, evicting the node could cause corruption. Have you evicted a failed node before doing anything else? I am going to do some testing and will let you all know. Looking forward to hearing from you. Appreciate your help. "danieldong" wrote: Rodney, App "danieldong" wrote: I am testing an active/passive cluster running W2003 and SQL 2005 SP2. What I try to test is: Power down one node and then on the active node using Add/Remove program to attempt to take that node out. According to what I read from the Web and a book, this is a required step regardless the accessibility of the node. When I am doing that, the System Configuration Check reports 9 errors and 7 warnings. That is what I expected since the node is not available. When I select "Maintain the Virtual Server", the node is shown in the Unavailable nodes list. However, on the Ready to Update page, the "install" button is dimmed out. It seems to be no way to take the node out of the cluster. Is there another way? What is the right way? I think what I am testing should be a realistic scenario. Thanks a lot for your help. Daniel Dong |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |