![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a SQL 2000 cluster and have applied SP3 to it. However, when running on one side of the cluster SQL reports a different version to when it is running on the other side. Is this normal / expected or has it not applied SP3 to the other node correctly? e.g Running on node 1 select @@version Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel X86) Dec 17 2002 14:22:05 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: ) --- SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductLevel') SP3 ------------------------ Running on node 2 select @@version Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.194 (Intel X86) Aug 6 2000 00:57:48 Copyright (c) 1988-2000 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: ) SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductLevel') RTM If this is not normal / exptected, can I just apply SP3 to node 2 on its own? Thanks. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi SQL 2000 sp3 automatically installs itself on all nodes of a cluster. You have a problem. Try running it on the 2nd node and see if it will install. Was B down when sp3 was installed? Regards Mike "Stephen Aldous" wrote: I have a SQL 2000 cluster and have applied SP3 to it. However, when running on one side of the cluster SQL reports a different version to when it is running on the other side. Is this normal / expected or has it not applied SP3 to the other node correctly? e.g Running on node 1 select @@version Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel X86) Dec 17 2002 14:22:05 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: ) --- SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductLevel') SP3 ------------------------ Running on node 2 select @@version Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.194 (Intel X86) Aug 6 2000 00:57:48 Copyright (c) 1988-2000 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: ) SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductLevel') RTM If this is not normal / exptected, can I just apply SP3 to node 2 on its own? Thanks. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I've tried to install SP3 on the virtual cluster name again and it crashes to desktop with an error with _INS576._mp error. Can I just fail it over to the second node and install SP3 on the local machine? "Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike (AT) epprecht (DOT) net> wrote in message news:76ECCB2C-267F-406E-B6EE-0CA05F435A2B (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Hi SQL 2000 sp3 automatically installs itself on all nodes of a cluster. You have a problem. Try running it on the 2nd node and see if it will install. Was B down when sp3 was installed? Regards Mike "Stephen Aldous" wrote: I have a SQL 2000 cluster and have applied SP3 to it. However, when running on one side of the cluster SQL reports a different version to when it is running on the other side. Is this normal / expected or has it not applied SP3 to the other node correctly? e.g Running on node 1 select @@version Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel X86) Dec 17 2002 14:22:05 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: ) --- SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductLevel') SP3 ------------------------ Running on node 2 select @@version Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.194 (Intel X86) Aug 6 2000 00:57:48 Copyright (c) 1988-2000 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: ) SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductLevel') RTM If this is not normal / exptected, can I just apply SP3 to node 2 on its own? Thanks. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |