![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Please let me know if the following scenerio is technically feasible. There is an active/passive cluster, users databases are mirrored. Mirror server has its own active/passive cluster. Thank you. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Please let me know if the following scenerio is technically feasible. There is an active/passive cluster, users databases are mirrored. Mirror server has its own active/passive cluster. Thank you. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
These are two different technologies and are basically unaware of each other so i dont see any reason this cant be done. I personally havent tried it but i have looked in to its feasibility and it looks to be possible. probably something that should be tested first but i wasnt able to find any reason it wouldnt work. Justin "HUBBUDD" <HUBBUDD (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:AD26B683-86D0-42F6-A6F0-B65EE3F1C217 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Please let me know if the following scenerio is technically feasible. There is an active/passive cluster, users databases are mirrored. Mirror server has its own active/passive cluster. Thank you. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |