![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know. Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005 -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Named Instance (NI01) -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have to choose Configuration B as main route? Thanks. -- Mohit K. Gupta B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese MCTS: SQL Server 2005 http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/ |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know. Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005 -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Named Instance (NI01) -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have to choose Configuration B as main route? Thanks. -- Mohit K. Gupta B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese MCTS: SQL Server 2005 http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/ |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know. Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005 -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Named Instance (NI01) -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have to choose Configuration B as main route? Thanks. -- Mohit K. Gupta B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese MCTS: SQL Server 2005 http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/ |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know. Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005 -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Named Instance (NI01) -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have to choose Configuration B as main route? Thanks. -- Mohit K. Gupta B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese MCTS: SQL Server 2005 http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/ |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know. Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005 -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Named Instance (NI01) -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have to choose Configuration B as main route? Thanks. -- Mohit K. Gupta B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese MCTS: SQL Server 2005 http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/ |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know. Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005 -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Named Instance (NI01) -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have to choose Configuration B as main route? Thanks. -- Mohit K. Gupta B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese MCTS: SQL Server 2005 http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/ |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know. Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005 -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Named Instance (NI01) -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have to choose Configuration B as main route? Thanks. -- Mohit K. Gupta B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese MCTS: SQL Server 2005 http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/ |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know. Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005 -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Named Instance (NI01) -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have to choose Configuration B as main route? Thanks. -- Mohit K. Gupta B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese MCTS: SQL Server 2005 http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/ |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know. Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01) -> Set to Fail Over to Node 3 Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B): Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005 -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Node 2: Named Instance (NI01) -> Set Fail Over to Node 3 Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have to choose Configuration B as main route? Thanks. -- Mohit K. Gupta B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese MCTS: SQL Server 2005 http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/ |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |