dbTalk Databases Forums  

Cluster Configurations

microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering


Discuss Cluster Configurations in the microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Mohit K. Gupta
 
Posts: n/a

Default Cluster Configurations - 09-20-2008 , 06:18 PM






Hi,

We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with
Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness
and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know.

Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3

Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3

Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have
to choose Configuration B as main route?

Thanks.

--
Mohit K. Gupta
B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese
MCTS: SQL Server 2005
http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Linchi Shea
 
Posts: n/a

Default RE: Cluster Configurations - 09-20-2008 , 10:42 PM






No, you cannot have two default SQL Server instances in the same cluster. So
your configuration A doesn't work.

Linchi

"Mohit K. Gupta" wrote:

Quote:
Hi,

We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with
Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness
and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know.

Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3

Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3

Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have
to choose Configuration B as main route?

Thanks.

--
Mohit K. Gupta
B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese
MCTS: SQL Server 2005
http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Linchi Shea
 
Posts: n/a

Default RE: Cluster Configurations - 09-20-2008 , 10:42 PM



No, you cannot have two default SQL Server instances in the same cluster. So
your configuration A doesn't work.

Linchi

"Mohit K. Gupta" wrote:

Quote:
Hi,

We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with
Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness
and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know.

Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3

Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3

Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have
to choose Configuration B as main route?

Thanks.

--
Mohit K. Gupta
B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese
MCTS: SQL Server 2005
http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Linchi Shea
 
Posts: n/a

Default RE: Cluster Configurations - 09-20-2008 , 10:42 PM



No, you cannot have two default SQL Server instances in the same cluster. So
your configuration A doesn't work.

Linchi

"Mohit K. Gupta" wrote:

Quote:
Hi,

We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with
Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness
and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know.

Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3

Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3

Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have
to choose Configuration B as main route?

Thanks.

--
Mohit K. Gupta
B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese
MCTS: SQL Server 2005
http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Linchi Shea
 
Posts: n/a

Default RE: Cluster Configurations - 09-20-2008 , 10:42 PM



No, you cannot have two default SQL Server instances in the same cluster. So
your configuration A doesn't work.

Linchi

"Mohit K. Gupta" wrote:

Quote:
Hi,

We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with
Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness
and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know.

Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3

Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3

Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have
to choose Configuration B as main route?

Thanks.

--
Mohit K. Gupta
B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese
MCTS: SQL Server 2005
http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Linchi Shea
 
Posts: n/a

Default RE: Cluster Configurations - 09-20-2008 , 10:42 PM



No, you cannot have two default SQL Server instances in the same cluster. So
your configuration A doesn't work.

Linchi

"Mohit K. Gupta" wrote:

Quote:
Hi,

We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with
Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness
and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know.

Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3

Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3

Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have
to choose Configuration B as main route?

Thanks.

--
Mohit K. Gupta
B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese
MCTS: SQL Server 2005
http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
Linchi Shea
 
Posts: n/a

Default RE: Cluster Configurations - 09-20-2008 , 10:42 PM



No, you cannot have two default SQL Server instances in the same cluster. So
your configuration A doesn't work.

Linchi

"Mohit K. Gupta" wrote:

Quote:
Hi,

We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with
Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness
and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know.

Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3

Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3

Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have
to choose Configuration B as main route?

Thanks.

--
Mohit K. Gupta
B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese
MCTS: SQL Server 2005
http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Linchi Shea
 
Posts: n/a

Default RE: Cluster Configurations - 09-20-2008 , 10:42 PM



No, you cannot have two default SQL Server instances in the same cluster. So
your configuration A doesn't work.

Linchi

"Mohit K. Gupta" wrote:

Quote:
Hi,

We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with
Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness
and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know.

Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3

Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3

Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have
to choose Configuration B as main route?

Thanks.

--
Mohit K. Gupta
B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese
MCTS: SQL Server 2005
http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
Linchi Shea
 
Posts: n/a

Default RE: Cluster Configurations - 09-20-2008 , 10:42 PM



No, you cannot have two default SQL Server instances in the same cluster. So
your configuration A doesn't work.

Linchi

"Mohit K. Gupta" wrote:

Quote:
Hi,

We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with
Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness
and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know.

Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3

Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3

Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have
to choose Configuration B as main route?

Thanks.

--
Mohit K. Gupta
B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese
MCTS: SQL Server 2005
http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
Linchi Shea
 
Posts: n/a

Default RE: Cluster Configurations - 09-20-2008 , 10:42 PM



No, you cannot have two default SQL Server instances in the same cluster. So
your configuration A doesn't work.

Linchi

"Mohit K. Gupta" wrote:

Quote:
Hi,

We are currently looking at setting up 3-Node Cluster with
Active/Active/Passive configuration. I am sorry clustering is my weakness
and I not very good at it, so if the question sounds wrong please let me know.

Configuration we are aiming for (Configuration A):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Default Instance (SQL2005) and Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set to Fail Over to Node 3

Configuration I was thinking we should do (Configruation B):
Node 1: Default Instance (SQL2005
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3
Node 2: Named Instance (NI01)
-> Set Fail Over to Node 3

Could someone please tell me if Configuration A is possible? Or do we have
to choose Configuration B as main route?

Thanks.

--
Mohit K. Gupta
B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese
MCTS: SQL Server 2005
http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.