![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Can I hae a Cluster consisting of: 2 servers - 1 With Windows NT Ent and MSCS - 1 With Windows 2003 ent - Clustering SQL 2000 SP3 ? can I, huh, huh? can I... |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- Asymmetrical clusters are not supported or recommended except during a rolling cluster upgrade. It probably will work, but since clustering is part of a high availability strategy, why would you want to set up something known to be less stable than it could be? -- Geoff N. Hiten Microsoft SQL Server MVP Senior Database Administrator Careerbuilder.com I support the Professional Association for SQL Server www.sqlpass.org "Onset" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4e8e01c402ce$79f822c0$a601280a (AT) phx (DOT) gbl... Can I hae a Cluster consisting of: 2 servers - 1 With Windows NT Ent and MSCS - 1 With Windows 2003 ent - Clustering SQL 2000 SP3 ? can I, huh, huh? can I... . |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Then, given that the SQL is current( SQL 2000 w/ SP3), what is the quickest way to upg the cluster's OS to Win 2k3? -----Original Message----- Asymmetrical clusters are not supported or recommended except during a rolling cluster upgrade. It probably will work, but since clustering is part of a high availability strategy, why would you want to set up something known to be less stable than it could be? -- Geoff N. Hiten Microsoft SQL Server MVP Senior Database Administrator Careerbuilder.com I support the Professional Association for SQL Server www.sqlpass.org "Onset" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4e8e01c402ce$79f822c0$a601280a (AT) phx (DOT) gbl... Can I hae a Cluster consisting of: 2 servers - 1 With Windows NT Ent and MSCS - 1 With Windows 2003 ent - Clustering SQL 2000 SP3 ? can I, huh, huh? can I... . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |