dbTalk Databases Forums  

Active/Active Question

microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering


Discuss Active/Active Question in the microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
 
Posts: n/a

Default Active/Active Question - 08-27-2004 , 10:17 AM







Hi,

Our customer wants to go from a standalone SQL server
implementation to a clustered one. We recommended
Active/Passive for them since they do not have a heavy
load, they just wnat redundancy. When they tested their
client application against the Active/Passive cluster
server they found out (as expected) that their client
application that was accessing the SQL server failed when
the cluster failover occured (the connection was lost when
they were doing thie bulk insert). I explained they needed
to modify their application to re-connect to the cluster
and retry the transaction. They dont like this.

The question I have is: Would an Active/Active
implentation prevent a customer from having to modify
their software? If a server fails will the client
application continue to do the bulk insert uninterrupted?

Thanks!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Geoff N. Hiten
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Active/Active Question - 08-27-2004 , 11:26 AM






Actrive/Active has a second (or more) SQL Instance on the cluster. The
behavior of the first instance is unchanged. The disconnect and reconnect
at failover will still have to happen. Active/Active does not imply both
nodes are servicing the same database or instance at the same time.

--
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Senior Database Administrator
Careerbuilder.com

I support the Professional Association for SQL Server
www.sqlpass.org

<anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote

Quote:
Hi,

Our customer wants to go from a standalone SQL server
implementation to a clustered one. We recommended
Active/Passive for them since they do not have a heavy
load, they just wnat redundancy. When they tested their
client application against the Active/Passive cluster
server they found out (as expected) that their client
application that was accessing the SQL server failed when
the cluster failover occured (the connection was lost when
they were doing thie bulk insert). I explained they needed
to modify their application to re-connect to the cluster
and retry the transaction. They dont like this.

The question I have is: Would an Active/Active
implentation prevent a customer from having to modify
their software? If a server fails will the client
application continue to do the bulk insert uninterrupted?

Thanks!



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
gjoslyn@parker.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Active/Active Question - 08-30-2004 , 02:30 PM



I would like to know the steps necessary to switch from an Active/Passive cluster to an Active/Active one.

From the messages I have been reading, it sounds like the only difference is that Active/Active services clients from two different SQL instances. Is that the case?

I have a Windows 2003 Enterprise Server Active/Passive cluster setup currently. I don't know how to change the model from A/P to A/A on the OS. I also am not sure about what to do with the SQL - is this just a separate instance, or does changing the OS to A/A also affect the SQL?

Please let me know,
Thanks.

************************************************** ********************
Sent via Fuzzy Software @ http://www.fuzzysoftware.com/
Comprehensive, categorised, searchable collection of links to ASP & ASP.NET resources...

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Geoff N. Hiten
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Active/Active Question - 08-30-2004 , 02:38 PM



There is no 'change'. Active\Active means having a second SQL instance,
complete with IP address, disk resources, and network name on your cluster.
The second instance does not have any interaction with the first instance.
It is a new virtual server that normally resides on a different host node
than the first. If you have unused shared disk resources and need a second
SQL server, then you can load SQL again on the cluster and create the new
instance.

--
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Senior Database Administrator
Careerbuilder.com

I support the Professional Association for SQL Server
www.sqlpass.org

"Grant Joslyn" <gjoslyn (AT) parker (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
I would like to know the steps necessary to switch from an Active/Passive
cluster to an Active/Active one.

From the messages I have been reading, it sounds like the only difference
is that Active/Active services clients from two different SQL instances. Is
that the case?
Quote:
I have a Windows 2003 Enterprise Server Active/Passive cluster setup
currently. I don't know how to change the model from A/P to A/A on the OS.
I also am not sure about what to do with the SQL - is this just a separate
instance, or does changing the OS to A/A also affect the SQL?
Quote:
Please let me know,
Thanks.

************************************************** ********************
Sent via Fuzzy Software @ http://www.fuzzysoftware.com/
Comprehensive, categorised, searchable collection of links to ASP &
ASP.NET resources...




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.